General Aircraft
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
Difference between Warthog and Thunderbolt
shonen_red
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
AeroScale: 543 posts
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
AeroScale: 543 posts
Posted: Monday, April 14, 2003 - 02:53 AM UTC
Is there any difference between the Warthog plane and the A-10 Thunderbolt in design etc. (except the color scheme)?
TwistedFate
Virginia, United States
Joined: February 11, 2003
KitMaker: 805 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: February 11, 2003
KitMaker: 805 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 14, 2003 - 02:57 AM UTC
The A-10 Thunderbolt II is the same plane as the Warthog. Thunderbolt is it's official name. Warthog is what it's affectionately known as.
brandydoguk
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: October 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,495 posts
AeroScale: 643 posts
Joined: October 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,495 posts
AeroScale: 643 posts
Posted: Monday, April 14, 2003 - 03:16 AM UTC
I once heard a rumour that the US airforce wanted to phase the A-10 out of service because they were losing a few due to pilots simply hitting the ground during training flight but the US army pressured them into keeping them as they are such good close support aircraft.
shonen_red
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
AeroScale: 543 posts
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
AeroScale: 543 posts
Posted: Monday, April 14, 2003 - 03:28 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I once heard a rumour that the US airforce wanted to phase the A-10 out of service because they were losing a few due to pilots simply hitting the ground during training flight but the US army pressured them into keeping them as they are such good close support aircraft.
WHAT! Do you mean they want to face off those great crafts? They're pretty good in terms of tactical combat. With that great arsenal, it is really useful for tactical firing. Darn those pilots! Can't they utilize it's abilities?
penpen
Hauts-de-Seine, France
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 14, 2003 - 03:53 AM UTC
The A10 was supposed to be replacede by newer versions of the A10.
You must remember that the A10 si getting a bit old now !
Also, it's survivability on a modern battleground is often placed in doubt (the same applies to helicopters).
Shonen : training of fighter or bomber pilots always costs a few planes and sadly a few lives. If you want to be efficient in combat, you must be able to push your plane "to the edge". And to do so, you must train, train hard. And sometimes someone pushes the plane too far, or there is a mechanical failure.
You must remember that the A10 si getting a bit old now !
Also, it's survivability on a modern battleground is often placed in doubt (the same applies to helicopters).
Shonen : training of fighter or bomber pilots always costs a few planes and sadly a few lives. If you want to be efficient in combat, you must be able to push your plane "to the edge". And to do so, you must train, train hard. And sometimes someone pushes the plane too far, or there is a mechanical failure.