World War II
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
aviation photos

lespauljames

Joined: January 06, 2007
KitMaker: 3,661 posts
AeroScale: 369 posts

Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2008 - 01:30 AM UTC
pics removed
Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2008 - 09:07 PM UTC
Thanks for the pictures. I have never seen the Stuka and the V1 picture before.
Thanks for sharing
Thanks for sharing


Roxter

Joined: July 04, 2007
KitMaker: 268 posts
AeroScale: 245 posts

Posted: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 03:38 AM UTC
Here're some more Legion Condor pics:
JU-87
Hs-126
Bf-109
He-111
JU-87


Hs-126

Bf-109




He-111



CRS

Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts

Posted: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 05:35 AM UTC
Not to be a rivet counter but FYI those "Horsa" photos are actually the CG-4A "Waco" called the "Hadrian" by UK forces


lespauljames

Joined: January 06, 2007
KitMaker: 3,661 posts
AeroScale: 369 posts

Posted: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 08:25 AM UTC
sorry, they are from my own private collection and im no glider specialst

lespauljames

Joined: January 06, 2007
KitMaker: 3,661 posts
AeroScale: 369 posts

Posted: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 08:45 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Thanks for the pictures. I have never seen the Stuka and the V1 picture before.
Thanks for sharing![]()
im really plesed with these. i got given 300 pics taken by mty grandads uncle, there were few aviation amongst them. hopefully a feature is being put through the works on armorama. ill be sure to post all the plane pics over here on aeroscale tho!!
thanks for the positie feedback

Yeti123

Joined: February 11, 2008
KitMaker: 311 posts
AeroScale: 278 posts

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 - 02:21 PM UTC
Thank you for sharing these pictures. The Condor Legion photos are excellent and a great refrence.
Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 - 11:14 PM UTC
Great pictures, Arseny. Now I have even more pictures to document my Bf 109 E in the between the wars campaign
I made the "6 O 79" for that campaign.
Thanks for sharing

Thanks for sharing


youngc

Joined: June 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,166 posts
AeroScale: 105 posts

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 12:37 AM UTC
Jimmy,
Incredibly good quality, your great-great uncle was quite a photographer. Looking forward to seeing the features.
Chas
Incredibly good quality, your great-great uncle was quite a photographer. Looking forward to seeing the features.
Chas

Roxter

Joined: July 04, 2007
KitMaker: 268 posts
AeroScale: 245 posts

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 12:56 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Great pictures, Arseny. Now I have even more pictures to document my Bf 109 E in the between the wars campaignI made the "6 O 79" for that campaign.
Thanks for sharing![]()
You're welcome, Jesper. Frankly speaking, I know little about 6 O 79, but one of the photos (with Molders) it seems that the particular Bf-109 is the earlier version than Emil. I guess it might be Dora or Caesar or even Anton.
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 09:05 PM UTC
Quoted Text
You're welcome, Jesper. Frankly speaking, I know little about 6 O 79, but one of the photos (with Molders) it seems that the particular Bf-109 is the earlier version than Emil. I guess it might be Dora or Caesar or even Anton.
Hi Arseny, my mistake. I have simply made so many models now I cannot remember straight anymore


wolfpack6

Joined: August 07, 2004
KitMaker: 179 posts
AeroScale: 80 posts

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 10:00 PM UTC
Great pics Arsney, thanks for the 109 pic Im doing a conversion right now to an A model from a E model.
What we have here with 6 O 79 is a C/D model, I cant tell the difference but it might be the tail wheel strut and the exaughst stubbs.
If you go buy the Buzz # on the aircraft it is a D model according to Ritger.
Hope this helps.
What we have here with 6 O 79 is a C/D model, I cant tell the difference but it might be the tail wheel strut and the exaughst stubbs.
If you go buy the Buzz # on the aircraft it is a D model according to Ritger.
Hope this helps.
![]() |