Firstly, both models are superb, no question there.
I cant really comment on the Corsair, but as far as the P47 goes its way over weathered for a ETO Thunderbolt. ( I wish we had enough sunshine here to fade paint that much
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06ab/d06ab722307f5efe356b0d378839d8800d636f8d" alt=""
)
It looks more like the fading extremes I would expect on a Pacific theatre aircraft.
I agree with the comment about the markings. If the paintwork had faded to that extreme then the markings would be a lot more faded/damaged than they are on the model.
In early 1944, Michael Quirks LM-K would have looked more like this photo.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff9bb/ff9bbb929c3ac24ffd2d754ca3eab4885ddfa444" alt=""
Another image here from a 63FS P-47 based at the same airfield around the same time as the LM-K model is depicting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c830f/c830fbbdaf23daa5ec2baa469162205f6290450f" alt=""
Not to take anyhing away from what is a fabulous looking Thunderbolt, and I really like it,but Im afraid the research lets it down somewhat.
Just my personal opinion
Nige