Early Aviation
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
REVIEW
Fly 1:48 Roland D.VI a&bJackFlash
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 - 11:42 AM UTC
The up and coming manufacturer "Fly" has been providing the modeling community with gems since they began. Their typical low pressure injected moulded kits are reminiscent of the the early Blue Max series without white metal extras. Now they have released their best yet. Filling the gap on our display shelves with a very reasonable 1:48 version of the Roland D.VI a & b types.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
thegirl
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2008
KitMaker: 6,743 posts
AeroScale: 6,151 posts
Joined: January 19, 2008
KitMaker: 6,743 posts
AeroScale: 6,151 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 22, 2009 - 02:29 AM UTC
An excellent review done Stephen ! The kit itself doesn't look all that bad . The lozenge reminds me of some of Eduards kit's The top is very close to Microsculpts though which is a plus like you said . What is also nice that there is enough lozenge to get two builds form if laid down right .
Thanks for the review and sharing the differences between the a and b models
Thanks for the review and sharing the differences between the a and b models
Kitboy
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 258 posts
AeroScale: 256 posts
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 258 posts
AeroScale: 256 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 22, 2009 - 04:09 AM UTC
Chances are quit big I run into one this weekend, and reading Stephen's words I very likely will buy one.
Cheers, Nico
Cheers, Nico
Alanroy
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: March 27, 2006
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Joined: March 27, 2006
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 - 12:12 AM UTC
Stephen,
New poster here. I was looking at the pictures of the US-marked D.VI b in your original review, and noticed that the upper wing camouflage in the photo of the wreck didn't seem to match the painting diagram in the instructions. Was there more than 1 in service with the USAAS? And where did the photos come from? I'd love to get hold of these. I'm a lover of the post-war Cook Field aircraft, and can't seem to find enough about them. My dilema now is, build the Blue Max or buy the Fly?
Thank you.
Regards,
Alan
amillen at seic dot com
New poster here. I was looking at the pictures of the US-marked D.VI b in your original review, and noticed that the upper wing camouflage in the photo of the wreck didn't seem to match the painting diagram in the instructions. Was there more than 1 in service with the USAAS? And where did the photos come from? I'd love to get hold of these. I'm a lover of the post-war Cook Field aircraft, and can't seem to find enough about them. My dilema now is, build the Blue Max or buy the Fly?
Thank you.
Regards,
Alan
amillen at seic dot com
JackFlash
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 - 08:27 AM UTC
Greetings Alan.
No only one was tested in this camouflage. Apparantly the camouflage was altered just before the crash. It seems they were trying to eliminate or at least cut down the areas that included the lightest colour. Sharp eye.
No only one was tested in this camouflage. Apparantly the camouflage was altered just before the crash. It seems they were trying to eliminate or at least cut down the areas that included the lightest colour. Sharp eye.
Alanroy
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: March 27, 2006
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Joined: March 27, 2006
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 - 03:18 AM UTC
Stephen,
Thanks for your reply. The sharp eye is one benefit of ADD. Something so innocuous like that catches my eye. Where would those pictures have come from? I've only ever seen the starboard sideview.
Regards,
Alan [email protected]
Thanks for your reply. The sharp eye is one benefit of ADD. Something so innocuous like that catches my eye. Where would those pictures have come from? I've only ever seen the starboard sideview.
Regards,
Alan [email protected]
JackFlash
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 - 08:09 AM UTC
I have had them in my collection for a long time. Originally they were in the possession of an aviation techincian who was stationed at McCook field 1920-22.
Alanroy
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: March 27, 2006
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Joined: March 27, 2006
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 19, 2009 - 12:29 AM UTC
Took a walk around your site. Would there happen to be a CD or Download of the McCook Field planes lurking somewhere that I couldn't find? That would be a wunnerful Chistmas present from me to myself.
Thanks again!
Alan [email protected]
Thanks again!
Alan [email protected]
JackFlash
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 19, 2009 - 04:38 PM UTC
I may have something in my reference files. Hold that thought.
Alanroy
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: March 27, 2006
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Joined: March 27, 2006
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 - 12:14 AM UTC
Whew, I'm back at the office. Wiped out over the weekend with a nasty flu.
Should this thread be moved elsewhere? At least the non-Roland part? Taken off-line? Or are we good?
Thanks for your time, Stephen.
Alan
Should this thread be moved elsewhere? At least the non-Roland part? Taken off-line? Or are we good?
Thanks for your time, Stephen.
Alan