Don't spend all your money before Christmas! You could well need some left in January, as Great Wall Hobby announce the release of the first new 1:48 mainstream kit of the TBD Devastator since the 1970s.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
World War II
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
NEWS
Devastating News from GWH!Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 12:32 AM UTC
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 12:57 AM UTC
Don't tell Gaston, it's sure to be fatally flawed I might get one even though it isn't in 1/32
Jessie_C
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 01:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Don't tell Gaston, it's sure to be fatally flawed
Then I pre-emptively invoke the Gaston Rule.
Naseby
Slovakia
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
AeroScale: 476 posts
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
AeroScale: 476 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 02:48 AM UTC
I have been waiting for this one for soooo long. Hope it will be acurate enought for a OOB.
russamotto
Utah, United States
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
AeroScale: 375 posts
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
AeroScale: 375 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 05:07 AM UTC
I just hope I can afford it. I'd love to get this when it comes out.
GastonMarty
Quebec, Canada
Joined: April 19, 2008
KitMaker: 595 posts
AeroScale: 507 posts
Joined: April 19, 2008
KitMaker: 595 posts
AeroScale: 507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 08:21 AM UTC
Well one thing for sure, given how good the old Monogram kit was, this was not the most needed subject of all those they could have picked...
In several most wanted kit surveys, and I can hardly remember the 1:48th Devastator being mentionned once in hundreds of posts, except a handful of times for 1:32 scale...
But then, if they base their research on 36 year old moulds, perhaps they should keep to less popular scale/subject combinations...
Given the work evident in their P-61, these guys seems VERY concerned about saving on research costs, as I will soon make evident (and yet they did not skip for that on the FW-189, or on many other aspects of quality, even on the P-61)...
Gaston
SunburntPenguin
Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Joined: March 15, 2011
KitMaker: 121 posts
AeroScale: 112 posts
Joined: March 15, 2011
KitMaker: 121 posts
AeroScale: 112 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 11:08 AM UTC
Gaston
Sight unseen, you are throwing this kit into the same basket as the P-61.
That's either very brave or extremely foolhardy.
How about we wait until we see this kit before making any judgements?
Sight unseen, you are throwing this kit into the same basket as the P-61.
That's either very brave or extremely foolhardy.
How about we wait until we see this kit before making any judgements?
Tailor
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: May 26, 2008
KitMaker: 1,168 posts
AeroScale: 199 posts
Joined: May 26, 2008
KitMaker: 1,168 posts
AeroScale: 199 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 11:44 AM UTC
Well, I have seen the CAD, but I have to say that - judging from the box - the Devastator will be fatally flawed! They never flew at the shown height and very likely not in that direction. Not even mentioning the wrong weather!
Guido
PS.: Be noted that we had the whole plane designed new, but threw everthing out and copied the Monogram kit only to annoy GM.
Guido
PS.: Be noted that we had the whole plane designed new, but threw everthing out and copied the Monogram kit only to annoy GM.
Naseby
Slovakia
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
AeroScale: 476 posts
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
AeroScale: 476 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 - 04:14 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Well one thing for sure, given how good the old Monogram kit was, this was not the most needed subject of all those they could have picked...
Considering I havent seen the Monogram kit in a decade it is a needed subject (Im not an ebay fan).