_GOTOBOTTOM
World War II
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
New He-219 assembled photos
scvrobeson
_VISITCOMMUNITY
United States
Joined: May 17, 2011
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 44 posts
Posted: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 - 11:25 PM UTC

Quoted Text










The argument here is that the difference in angle will change what the crappy Revell nacelles look like...

It's a great read, if you can manage the attention span...

Gaston




Yes, the change in angle will change the appearance of the parts you moron. Clearly you don't have the attention span to actually look for accuracy or even facts, and just pull these half-assed "arguments" out to try and bash a kit you have never even personally seen in the plastic.


Sorry everyone for losing my temper. I just can't stand people who try and make up arguments about perfectly good kits by using falsified "facts" and poor photos.


Matt
tango35
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Germany
Joined: June 05, 2002
KitMaker: 12 posts
AeroScale: 7 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 - 05:18 AM UTC
Its very interesting to hear people who havent the kit in their own hands to make their own opinion. And, the engineers were in the States to make their homework, trust me, i know the guys.
And the kit of Dieter Wegmann is a first testshot, so wait till September to cry ot to be pleased.
chukw1
_VISITCOMMUNITY
California, United States
Joined: November 28, 2007
KitMaker: 817 posts
AeroScale: 729 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 - 04:32 PM UTC
This thread is unworthy of this forum. Just a bunch of bashing on ALL sides. Moderator, please lock or delete this trash. Back to your benches!
scvrobeson
_VISITCOMMUNITY
United States
Joined: May 17, 2011
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 44 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 19, 2012 - 11:34 AM UTC
Thank you Chuk. I apologize for my unsavory comments earlier on in the thread. I have tried editing, but I can't find the button to edit my older posts

Really enjoying your Ju-388 build. I've been trying techniques I learn from you on my builds


I think he's right. This thread has really gone wrong. My apologies


Matt
SunburntPenguin
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Joined: March 15, 2011
KitMaker: 121 posts
AeroScale: 112 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 19, 2012 - 09:21 PM UTC

Quoted Text











It's a great read, if you can manage the attention span...




I agree with everyone here in regards to this thread not contributing anything, yet I leave everyone with the above quote from our friend Gaston.

He got personal and has run off, yet again.

I make no apologies for trying to make Gaston see reason, it's his choice to not take heed of what some of us have to say.
Krischan
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Joined: July 03, 2005
KitMaker: 17 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 22, 2012 - 10:34 PM UTC
Now that the kit is released, is there any new information about it´s accuracy? I´ll get my Uhu tomorrow anyhow (and I´m determined to build it ), so it would be nice to know if there are any substantial issues.

Greetings
Christian
scvrobeson
_VISITCOMMUNITY
United States
Joined: May 17, 2011
KitMaker: 65 posts
AeroScale: 44 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 08, 2012 - 11:52 AM UTC
Yes, there currently is a thread going on LargeScalePlanes about the Uhu. it does appear that the nacelles are a little bit off, and the nose is bit bulbous, but it really shouldn't put people off this kit. It's a great value for money, and finally an He-219 in 1/32. And soon the Z-M kit will be out as well.



Matt
 _GOTOTOP