World War II
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
Why?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcdbf/dcdbf7338cebb367ee567d2a0b2e64dbf0ede746" alt=""
72ndbrigade
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e408/6e40866cd5f1dc278a933590b321a9e72e13f6eb" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: September 27, 2012
KitMaker: 29 posts
AeroScale: 8 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0649/d0649d8e37e552752e70bc63e630f90a0431d23b" alt="2nd Lieutenant"
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 08:22 AM UTC
Is there no "Special Interest Group" for the P-51 Mustang. I know, dumb question but I had to ask. It seems that there was more widespread Allied use of the 'Stang and more variants than the Thunderbolt. Don't get me wrong, the P-47 is my second-favorite fighter but it would seem that the Mustang would be a popular favorite. Before I start rambling on, I'll sign-off for today.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de9e1/de9e176223f318376b325330b22d6671fc803c8b" alt=""
raypalmer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0577/d057722e3ad9c72dc07f799f63feff3e7124501d" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: March 29, 2010
KitMaker: 1,151 posts
AeroScale: 985 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19eac/19eac2d496948b23c7ee50847e53cabe48d8f1a1" alt="Warrant Officer Class 3"
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 11:24 AM UTC
I'm eternally stunned that there's a section devoted to any single airframe. Variety is the spice of life. I can only stare at a beautiful aircraft for so long, let alone a mug like the 47 or a runner-up like the 51 (sorry but Spitfires, 109's, A6M's and MC202's are just a few of the more attractive airplanes I can think of.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcdbf/dcdbf7338cebb367ee567d2a0b2e64dbf0ede746" alt=""
72ndbrigade
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e408/6e40866cd5f1dc278a933590b321a9e72e13f6eb" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: September 27, 2012
KitMaker: 29 posts
AeroScale: 8 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0649/d0649d8e37e552752e70bc63e630f90a0431d23b" alt="2nd Lieutenant"
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 01:01 PM UTC
Very good point there Ray! Spitfires might also be a candidate though. Very sleek aircraft!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f675f/f675f2395da25baffbe2c1414307da66130e00d3" alt=""
spiralcity
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e408/6e40866cd5f1dc278a933590b321a9e72e13f6eb" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: October 14, 2012
KitMaker: 150 posts
AeroScale: 107 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c5b3/1c5b3e9491192db9d5ba51006f29d5bff94639fc" alt="1st Lieutenant"
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 06:39 PM UTC
It's all subjective really. I personally feel the Italians produced some of the sleekest looking birds of WWII. The Macchi 202 and 205 are perhaps the best looking planes of the war in my opinion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc065/bc065a24acce87c881cabd58781212eef498ab19" alt=""
Siderius
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e408/6e40866cd5f1dc278a933590b321a9e72e13f6eb" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: September 20, 2005
KitMaker: 1,747 posts
AeroScale: 1,673 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17265/172657495f4712011e4ad27d0fcee4be2f10b44f" alt="Brig. General"
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 09:11 PM UTC
It is all up to personal choice, so very true. I agree that the Italians are neglected. They did produce some very interesting designs, even their bomber aircraft like the Cant Z 1007. Very nice indeed. Russell
![]() |