Hosted by Rowan Baylis
A20J Havoc
propboy44256
Ohio, United States
Joined: November 20, 2002
KitMaker: 1,038 posts
AeroScale: 285 posts
Joined: November 20, 2002
KitMaker: 1,038 posts
AeroScale: 285 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2003 - 01:13 AM UTC
Picked up this 1/48 scale model. I never heard of this one..Seems like competion for the Marader or Mitchell bombers?....Trying to get information on its role in WW2 or pictures..Any thing will help..Thanx in advance
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2003 - 01:57 AM UTC
propboy44256
Hope these sites help:
http://ansmodelisme.topcities.com/SECOND/plane/a20.html
http://navalhistory.flixco.info/H/143697/8330/a0.htm
http://www.worldwar2pilots.com/AAF-B-Arnett2.htm
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/modern_flight/mf14.htm
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/attack/a3/a3-2.htm" TARGET="_blank"> http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/attack/a3/a3-2.htm
Hope these sites help:
http://ansmodelisme.topcities.com/SECOND/plane/a20.html
http://navalhistory.flixco.info/H/143697/8330/a0.htm
http://www.worldwar2pilots.com/AAF-B-Arnett2.htm
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/modern_flight/mf14.htm
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/attack/a3/a3-2.htm" TARGET="_blank"> http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/attack/a3/a3-2.htm
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2003 - 02:05 AM UTC
propboy44256
Forgot to mention that the A20 was modified and used by the British as a night fighter designated Havoc II. The night fighter was later redisignated as a P70 by the US.
P70 info is here:
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/p70.htm
TYPE Remarks
P-70B-2 A-20G and -J; trainers for P-61
Forgot to mention that the A20 was modified and used by the British as a night fighter designated Havoc II. The night fighter was later redisignated as a P70 by the US.
P70 info is here:
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/p70.htm
TYPE Remarks
P-70B-2 A-20G and -J; trainers for P-61
jarhead
Iowa, United States
Joined: April 20, 2003
KitMaker: 32 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: April 20, 2003
KitMaker: 32 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2003 - 04:13 PM UTC
The A-20 was used both in Europe& the Pacific. Several versions. Try to find A-20 in Action for information. Hopes this helps. Jarhead
RotorHead67
Virginia, United States
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 1,174 posts
AeroScale: 226 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 1,174 posts
AeroScale: 226 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2003 - 07:38 PM UTC
Propboy,
The Squadron?Signal in action book will answer all ?? and there are some decals from aeromaster and superscale for this ARCFT. Good luck HAppy Hunting. Todd
The Squadron?Signal in action book will answer all ?? and there are some decals from aeromaster and superscale for this ARCFT. Good luck HAppy Hunting. Todd
chip250
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: September 01, 2002
KitMaker: 1,864 posts
AeroScale: 410 posts
Joined: September 01, 2002
KitMaker: 1,864 posts
AeroScale: 410 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 15, 2003 - 01:29 PM UTC
I built on A-20. It was one of my first, so it sucked!
So I got another one, and it is waiting to get built. Is yours the AMT kit?
~Chip :-)
So I got another one, and it is waiting to get built. Is yours the AMT kit?
~Chip :-)
Posted: Sunday, November 16, 2003 - 08:58 AM UTC
Hi there
I love Phantom's "bone yard" diorama! - Stunning! :-)
AMTs A-20 is basically a good kit, but there are a couple of points to watch out for...
1. The control surfaces should be fabric-covered.
2. The prominent life-raft pack is missing from the space behind the pilot's headrest.
3. The kit main-wheels are moulded with a rather peculiar tread pattern.
I used to produce an after-market set to correct these faults, but I sold the last one years ago...
I've also read that the main landing gear legs need moving forward about 1/4 inch... but this isn't something I've ever checked out personally.
All the best
Rowan
I love Phantom's "bone yard" diorama! - Stunning! :-)
AMTs A-20 is basically a good kit, but there are a couple of points to watch out for...
1. The control surfaces should be fabric-covered.
2. The prominent life-raft pack is missing from the space behind the pilot's headrest.
3. The kit main-wheels are moulded with a rather peculiar tread pattern.
I used to produce an after-market set to correct these faults, but I sold the last one years ago...
I've also read that the main landing gear legs need moving forward about 1/4 inch... but this isn't something I've ever checked out personally.
All the best
Rowan
Bren
Cape Province, South Africa
Joined: July 07, 2002
KitMaker: 381 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: July 07, 2002
KitMaker: 381 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2003 - 04:35 PM UTC
I got the Amt one sitting on my shelf.
The A20 is perhaps my favourite plane, it , it, it is just so ........
The A20 is perhaps my favourite plane, it , it, it is just so ........
propboy44256
Ohio, United States
Joined: November 20, 2002
KitMaker: 1,038 posts
AeroScale: 285 posts
Joined: November 20, 2002
KitMaker: 1,038 posts
AeroScale: 285 posts
Posted: Monday, November 24, 2003 - 04:56 AM UTC
yes same one..
Quoted Text
I built on A-20. It was one of my first, so it sucked!
So I got another one, and it is waiting to get built. Is yours the AMT kit?
~Chip :-)