I recently acquired the Mauve P-40M at a local show this past weekend. Now reading a review online it seems as though this kit is pretty good. But it got me curious; how is this kit compared to more recent iterations of the P-40? I've built one other Warhawk before, the Revell P-40B. But I don't remember anything about it because I built it many years ago.
So I'd like to know, just out of curiosity, how the Mauve P-40M compares to newer kits.
(And yes, in case you're so inclined, I will be buying some update sets for this. I got my eyes set on a PE one that I saw on Amazon or a resin/PE one along with a a blast bulge(?), a seat, and a wheel set by OzMods. And a set of decals because I really don't want to use the kit's decals.)
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
How is the Mauve P-40M against new kits?
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
AeroScale: 63 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
AeroScale: 63 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 - 11:48 AM UTC
berndm
Niedersachsen, Germany
Joined: March 26, 2014
KitMaker: 844 posts
AeroScale: 630 posts
Joined: March 26, 2014
KitMaker: 844 posts
AeroScale: 630 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 - 10:08 AM UTC
Hmmmm... this kit is looking quite good, if you look at other
modelling sites on the WWW.
I belive Eduard sell a version on this kit some years ago.
I am doing a version on Hasegawas P-40 right now, right here.
It is a very good kit fot itself, but somewhat tricky to build
But build they look the part.
modelling sites on the WWW.
I belive Eduard sell a version on this kit some years ago.
I am doing a version on Hasegawas P-40 right now, right here.
It is a very good kit fot itself, but somewhat tricky to build
But build they look the part.
chris1
Auckland, New Zealand
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 949 posts
AeroScale: 493 posts
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 949 posts
AeroScale: 493 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 - 12:19 PM UTC
Hi Michael,
I believe the Italeri P-40 is the same kit.
I found it not to bad the gaps between some parts(particularly the wings around where they join the fuselage underneath)
Overall while it may not be up to Hasegawa standards its not bad and in the end it looks like a P-40.
I'd like to see how you get on.
HTH
Chris
I believe the Italeri P-40 is the same kit.
I found it not to bad the gaps between some parts(particularly the wings around where they join the fuselage underneath)
Overall while it may not be up to Hasegawa standards its not bad and in the end it looks like a P-40.
I'd like to see how you get on.
HTH
Chris
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
AeroScale: 63 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
AeroScale: 63 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 - 03:35 PM UTC
Ok. I'll have to look into this kit more. The review I was looking at was written in 2011 so the statement "considered one of the best P-40s in 1/48 scale" 'might' be outdated by now.
Chris: I'll probably be starting this kit by mid-June or sometime during early- to mid-summer. I need the money to acquire the AM pieces I want to use with the kit. Might be the first time I'll be using resin and AM photoetch.
Chris: I'll probably be starting this kit by mid-June or sometime during early- to mid-summer. I need the money to acquire the AM pieces I want to use with the kit. Might be the first time I'll be using resin and AM photoetch.
berndm
Niedersachsen, Germany
Joined: March 26, 2014
KitMaker: 844 posts
AeroScale: 630 posts
Joined: March 26, 2014
KitMaker: 844 posts
AeroScale: 630 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 - 08:03 PM UTC
Hi
I can t wait to see it. The P-40 series are great looking Birds
I can t wait to see it. The P-40 series are great looking Birds
chris1
Auckland, New Zealand
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 949 posts
AeroScale: 493 posts
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 949 posts
AeroScale: 493 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 08, 2014 - 07:29 AM UTC
Hi Again Michael,
Which markings are you to go with.
I'd suggest maybe an RNZAF(I'm not biased)
If you do I may be able to help with research.
Cheers
Chris
Which markings are you to go with.
I'd suggest maybe an RNZAF(I'm not biased)
If you do I may be able to help with research.
Cheers
Chris
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
AeroScale: 63 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
AeroScale: 63 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 08, 2014 - 02:07 PM UTC
It's ok. I understand the "non-bias." And although I've read that the M version wasn't used much with the USAAF, there were still some that made it into the AAF's inventory. I will be getting some decals for an AAF plane and decide from there. I'm not going for accuracy towards one specific craft or pilot but instead I want to try to make it look nice.