Quoted Text
go figure..I think this is becoming a contest to see who builds the best WWI fighter
Initially these were my sentiments as well, however upon reflection, I think that WW1 subjects are simply appreciated by model makers for the tremendous amount of work that needs to go into them to make them 'look right'. With a raft of potential pitfalls - is there anything that looks worst on a model than loose or slack biplane rigging or a twisted u/c unit? - they simply require (IMHO) more work to make them look the finished item.
Also, a multitude of effects, i.e. canvas, dope, wood, brass, leather, castor oil and fuel staining etc all have to be replicated in paint and then 'brought together' in balance.
And before anyone suggests "Wingnuts Wings" kits build themselves and anyone can produce a wining model from them; whilst a marvel of the toolmakers art, they still require careful assembly and a skilled hand with a paint or air brush to bring them to life and do them justice in order to compete at MOTM level.
Bottom line, all those in the top 3 were worthy potential winners but ultimately, it was democratic and free voting from their peers on this site that decided the winner(s).
Congratulations to all and a worthy winner for April MOTM.
Gary