Grumman's A-6 Intruder didn't exude sexiness. It wasn't sleek nor was it particularly fast. What it did best was to carry large loads of things which go bang through any kind of weather and drop them exactly where they were supposed to go. It did this through thick and thin for more than 30 years.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Modern (1975-today)
Discuss the modern aircraft age from 1975 thru today.
Discuss the modern aircraft age from 1975 thru today.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
FEATURE
Grumman A-6EJessie_C
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Posted: Friday, October 17, 2014 - 06:15 PM UTC
Posted: Friday, October 17, 2014 - 06:31 PM UTC
Joel I really enjoyed watching your build take shape and progress, Thank you
I urge you to send in a full build feature as I feel this is one of those builds that many will look at for guidance in the future.
I urge you to send in a full build feature as I feel this is one of those builds that many will look at for guidance in the future.
berndm
Niedersachsen, Germany
Joined: March 26, 2014
KitMaker: 844 posts
AeroScale: 630 posts
Joined: March 26, 2014
KitMaker: 844 posts
AeroScale: 630 posts
Posted: Friday, October 17, 2014 - 06:37 PM UTC
A well presented and informative summary of this long and interesting build with great pictures of the completed A-6.
Well done Joel, must be an impressive sight, together with your F-4
Again Congratulations
Bernd
Well done Joel, must be an impressive sight, together with your F-4
Again Congratulations
Bernd
Joel_W
Associate Editor
New York, United States
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 - 12:35 AM UTC
Jessica,
Thank you for taking the time to complete the feature process to my article. It's much appreciated.
Darren,
Thanks for following along from the start to the finish line. I'm a little confused as to what you're referring to by a full build feature. How is that different then the detailed build blog I did in the Cold War forum?
Bernd,
And of course a special thanks to you who also has been there from day one of the build to the end of my journey. I can tell you that having both the A-6E and the F-4B seating side by side in Navy colors from the same period, is quite a sight. They also occupy a good 3 feet of display space.
Joel
Thank you for taking the time to complete the feature process to my article. It's much appreciated.
Darren,
Thanks for following along from the start to the finish line. I'm a little confused as to what you're referring to by a full build feature. How is that different then the detailed build blog I did in the Cold War forum?
Bernd,
And of course a special thanks to you who also has been there from day one of the build to the end of my journey. I can tell you that having both the A-6E and the F-4B seating side by side in Navy colors from the same period, is quite a sight. They also occupy a good 3 feet of display space.
Joel
Boogieboy
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 02, 2005
KitMaker: 8 posts
AeroScale: 6 posts
Joined: January 02, 2005
KitMaker: 8 posts
AeroScale: 6 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 - 01:39 AM UTC
Joel-
Boogieboy
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 02, 2005
KitMaker: 8 posts
AeroScale: 6 posts
Joined: January 02, 2005
KitMaker: 8 posts
AeroScale: 6 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 - 01:51 AM UTC
Joel- Fine work on the A-6E, but a few small corrections on the narrative: The A-6's did not have ailerons, nor flaperons; they used spoilers on top of the wings for control about the roll axis. The wingtip speedbrakes were used as speedbrakes only, not for inducing a roll, They opened/closed together on both wingtips simultaneously. Please note the correct spelling of "ordnance".
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 - 07:19 AM UTC
Great work Joel!
Posted: Sunday, October 19, 2014 - 03:28 AM UTC
Jorl, super Intruder! I can imagine how good it looks next to the F-4B.
Posted: Sunday, October 19, 2014 - 03:40 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Darren,
Thanks for following along from the start to the finish line. I'm a little confused as to what you're referring to by a full build feature. How is that different then the detailed build blog I did in the Cold War forum?
Joel
Joel
What I meant was a full blow by blow article covering from start to finish, that way the images will always be accessable along with the information you have provided.
Posted: Sunday, October 19, 2014 - 05:29 AM UTC
Hi Joel
Great build! All Darren's saying is that the photos in your blog aren't future-proofed the way they would be if they were uploaded as "content" photos for Aeroscale.
All the best
Rowan
Great build! All Darren's saying is that the photos in your blog aren't future-proofed the way they would be if they were uploaded as "content" photos for Aeroscale.
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Sunday, October 19, 2014 - 06:53 AM UTC
Hi Kevin
Thanks for the comment about "flaperons" (or lack thereof..) . I found this on Joe Baugher's website that explains things further:
"The wing had trailing-edge flaps that extended over almost the entire length of the wing, so conventional ailerons were not fitted. Lateral controls was provided at low speeds by the movements of the flaps (operating as "flaperons") and at high speeds by a series of spoilers mounted on the upper wing surface. The spoilers could be operated differentially for roll control in flight."
All the best
Rowan
Thanks for the comment about "flaperons" (or lack thereof..) . I found this on Joe Baugher's website that explains things further:
"The wing had trailing-edge flaps that extended over almost the entire length of the wing, so conventional ailerons were not fitted. Lateral controls was provided at low speeds by the movements of the flaps (operating as "flaperons") and at high speeds by a series of spoilers mounted on the upper wing surface. The spoilers could be operated differentially for roll control in flight."
All the best
Rowan
BurtGustaf
California, United States
Joined: February 10, 2014
KitMaker: 15 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Joined: February 10, 2014
KitMaker: 15 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 19, 2014 - 01:40 PM UTC
A very impressive A6 Joel, very nicely done. An excellent paint job and the decals look super. Again very nicely done.
Gremlin56
Joined: October 30, 2005
KitMaker: 3,897 posts
AeroScale: 564 posts
KitMaker: 3,897 posts
AeroScale: 564 posts
Posted: Monday, October 20, 2014 - 06:01 AM UTC
What a magnificent build Joel. Really top notch build of another "Iron Works" aircraft.
ubisuck
Quebec, Canada
Joined: December 20, 2012
KitMaker: 461 posts
AeroScale: 85 posts
Joined: December 20, 2012
KitMaker: 461 posts
AeroScale: 85 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 23, 2014 - 12:42 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The A-6 Intruder could and did carry every Missile and Bomb (including Nuclear weapons) in the Navy’s arsenal.
Great work on the A-6. Always loved that airplane.
I don't think it could carry the Aim-54 Phoenix? It's only launch platform was the F-14 Tomcat. Am I wrong, just curiosity.
Marc/ubi
Jessie_C
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 23, 2014 - 03:13 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I don't think it could carry the Aim-54 Phoenix? It's only launch platform was the F-14 Tomcat. Am I wrong, just curiosity.
I don't think that it was Sparrow capable either. I think that Joel had in mind ground attack missiles such as Shrikes, Standards, Bullpups and the like.
The Intruder dug holes in the ground. The only times it distributed airplane parts was when they were on the ground.
Joel_W
Associate Editor
New York, United States
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Posted: Friday, October 24, 2014 - 07:22 AM UTC
To further clarify my statement, here's the full weapons load available for the A-6E with various electronic upgrades:
Rockets:
2.75 in (70 mm) FFAR Rocket Pod
5 in (127 mm) Zuni Rocket Pod
Missiles:
AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missile
AGM-45 Shrike anti-radiation missile
AGM-62 Walleye TV-guided glide bomb
AGM-65 Maverick air-to-ground missile
AGM-84 Harpoon air-to-ground missile
AGM-88 HARM anti-radiation missile
Bombs:
Mk 81 250 lb (113 kg) GP bombs
Mk 82 500 lb (227 kg) GP bombs
Mk 83 1,000 lb (454 kg) GP bombs
Mk 84 2,000 lb (907 kg) GP bombs
Mk 117 750 lb (340 kg) GP bombs
Mk-20 Rockeye II cluster bombs
CBU-89 GATOR mine cluster bombs
Mk 77 750 lb (340 kg) incendiary bombs
GBU-10 Paveway II laser-guided bombs
GBU-12 Paveway II laser-guided bombs
GBU-16 Paveway II laser-guided bombs
B43 nuclear bomb
B57 nuclear bomb
B61 nuclear bomb
B83 nuclear bomb
Various air-dropped landmines
Various air-dropped underwater mines
Various practice bombs [Mk-76, BDU-45, LGTR, etc.]
Joel
Rockets:
2.75 in (70 mm) FFAR Rocket Pod
5 in (127 mm) Zuni Rocket Pod
Missiles:
AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missile
AGM-45 Shrike anti-radiation missile
AGM-62 Walleye TV-guided glide bomb
AGM-65 Maverick air-to-ground missile
AGM-84 Harpoon air-to-ground missile
AGM-88 HARM anti-radiation missile
Bombs:
Mk 81 250 lb (113 kg) GP bombs
Mk 82 500 lb (227 kg) GP bombs
Mk 83 1,000 lb (454 kg) GP bombs
Mk 84 2,000 lb (907 kg) GP bombs
Mk 117 750 lb (340 kg) GP bombs
Mk-20 Rockeye II cluster bombs
CBU-89 GATOR mine cluster bombs
Mk 77 750 lb (340 kg) incendiary bombs
GBU-10 Paveway II laser-guided bombs
GBU-12 Paveway II laser-guided bombs
GBU-16 Paveway II laser-guided bombs
B43 nuclear bomb
B57 nuclear bomb
B61 nuclear bomb
B83 nuclear bomb
Various air-dropped landmines
Various air-dropped underwater mines
Various practice bombs [Mk-76, BDU-45, LGTR, etc.]
Joel