_GOTOBOTTOM
Cold War (1950-1974)
Discuss the aircraft modeling subjects during the Cold War period.
Hosted by Tim Hatton
REVIEW
F9F-8/8P Cougar
tinbanger
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Ontario, Canada
Joined: February 04, 2008
KitMaker: 2,507 posts
AeroScale: 1,814 posts
Posted: Monday, March 09, 2015 - 05:26 AM UTC
The F9F-6 Cougar was Grumman''s successor for the Navy''s then current Carrier fighter aircraft, the F8F Panther series. For some reason the Navy viewed the Cougar as an upgraded version of the Panther rather then the next generation fighter aircraft, even though it featured swept wings rather then the straight wings.

Link to Item

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
Merlin
Staff MemberSenior Editor
AEROSCALE
#017
_VISITCOMMUNITY
United Kingdom
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 17,582 posts
AeroScale: 12,795 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - 12:49 AM UTC
Cheers Joel

Excellent review! It looks a nice kit overall, but great catches on the slip-ups. I'm looking forward to seeing how it goes together when you get a chance to tackle the beastie - good alignment of the fuselage parts looks pretty critical for a successful build...

All the best

Rowan
mlreyes
_VISITCOMMUNITY
California, United States
Joined: April 29, 2011
KitMaker: 1 posts
AeroScale: 1 posts
Posted: Monday, May 22, 2017 - 06:11 PM UTC
Joel: Thanks for the fine review of the Kitty Hawk Cougar. One comment, however, is that there is no provision in the kit for the wings to be built extended; the kit has provisions for the wings to be built folded only. Notice the long slot on the top of the outer wing...it is designed as the attachement point, to glue the outer wing to the main body. Excellent review otherwise.
spiralcity
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Illinois, United States
Joined: October 14, 2012
KitMaker: 150 posts
AeroScale: 107 posts
Posted: Friday, June 02, 2017 - 07:25 AM UTC
Nice review Joel, and thanks for all the catches on the kits mistakes. I for one am not the type who would wring his hands over small details about sidewinders. As far as the re-scribing goes, I guess a purist may want to tackle that, but even that issue would not be a deal breaker for me. Thanks for the great review.
 _GOTOTOP