General Aircraft
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
Aircraft scales
ave
Klang, Malaysia
Joined: March 24, 2003
KitMaker: 417 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: March 24, 2003
KitMaker: 417 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 12:20 AM UTC
How come most aircraft are made in 1/48 or 1/72 and not in 1/35?
flitzer
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: November 13, 2003
KitMaker: 2,240 posts
AeroScale: 743 posts
Joined: November 13, 2003
KitMaker: 2,240 posts
AeroScale: 743 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 12:50 AM UTC
Hi ave,
I imagine it has to do with the room the end user, us modellers, have to store or display the models.
Obviuosly the 1/72nd allows many models in a confined space and 1/48th more detail but less models. 1/35th might be too big for most of us.
Any other reasons out there?
Cheers
Peter
I imagine it has to do with the room the end user, us modellers, have to store or display the models.
Obviuosly the 1/72nd allows many models in a confined space and 1/48th more detail but less models. 1/35th might be too big for most of us.
Any other reasons out there?
Cheers
Peter
shonen_red
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
AeroScale: 543 posts
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
AeroScale: 543 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 12:57 AM UTC
Imagine a 1/35 SCUD Launcher which is a foot long. Compare that to the F-117 in 1/48 which is STILL longer than the 1/35 SCUD Launcher. Imagine if both of them are in 1/35
mossieramm
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: September 17, 2003
KitMaker: 253 posts
AeroScale: 81 posts
Joined: September 17, 2003
KitMaker: 253 posts
AeroScale: 81 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 02:03 AM UTC
What I don't get is why aircraft are in 1/32 scale and AFV are in 1/35. Wouldn't it make sense to make it one scale ?? You could make some really neat dioramas then.
shonen_red
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
AeroScale: 543 posts
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
AeroScale: 543 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 02:08 AM UTC
My best bet again is the storage space. See, only a few 1/32 and 1/24 crafts have been developed unless you wanna put a 1/24 Harrier with a 1/24 Enzo Ferrari. That doesn't make sense either. Maybe some members have better opinions.
AJLaFleche
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
AeroScale: 328 posts
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
AeroScale: 328 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 04:20 AM UTC
1/72 scale was based on the solid identification models used in WWII. Airfix pioneered standardizing to this scale in the late 50's early 60's. American companies had been doing box scale, or whatever scale fit in the box size for the retail shelf and Revell saw the light about the time they released their first Memphis Belle (B-17F) around 1962 or 63. Monogram standardized on 1/48. I don't know why they chose that size but they needed a larger scale since many of their releases of the early 60's had working features that needed the larger size to accomodate the dropping bomb, retactable gear and folding wings.
I've never understood the 1/32-1/35 division, since figures were being produced in 54mm (approximately 1/32) before the big influx of armor models. It also seems bizarre that Tamiya, with all its 1/35 figures and armor would release 1/32 aircraft.
I've never understood the 1/32-1/35 division, since figures were being produced in 54mm (approximately 1/32) before the big influx of armor models. It also seems bizarre that Tamiya, with all its 1/35 figures and armor would release 1/32 aircraft.
Ranger74
Tennessee, United States
Joined: April 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,290 posts
AeroScale: 87 posts
Joined: April 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,290 posts
AeroScale: 87 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 04:57 AM UTC
What gets me is why they didn't use 1/36? That would keep a mathematical standard based on 12's. That would be too simple #:-)
tek2
New York, United States
Joined: June 06, 2002
KitMaker: 156 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: June 06, 2002
KitMaker: 156 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 06:10 AM UTC
The Japanese use the metric system.
But I still don't understand the "why?" of the different scales. Especially 1/32", and 1/35". Why not just one?
Will we ever know?
But I still don't understand the "why?" of the different scales. Especially 1/32", and 1/35". Why not just one?
Will we ever know?
dbusack
South Dakota, United States
Joined: May 10, 2002
KitMaker: 971 posts
AeroScale: 191 posts
Joined: May 10, 2002
KitMaker: 971 posts
AeroScale: 191 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 06:50 AM UTC
I'm just glad to see more and more helicopters coming out in 1/35th scale.
Don
Don