betheyn
Senior Editordata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76419/7641917542674db2a7cc6d911a3e68b095aa6a58" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#019
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 14, 2004
KitMaker: 4,560 posts
AeroScale: 2,225 posts
Posted: Monday, February 08, 2016 - 12:51 PM UTC
John Griesbacker takes a look at Trumpeters 1/72nd Su-24MR, which is a new tooling release.
Link to ItemIf you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48d84/48d8433ae4b97603834ecd9767097980786f7b1c" alt=""
It's not the same, better, but not the same...
JPTRR
Managing Editordata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76419/7641917542674db2a7cc6d911a3e68b095aa6a58" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#051
Tennessee, United States
Joined: December 21, 2002
KitMaker: 7,772 posts
AeroScale: 3,175 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 01:33 AM UTC
A model right out of the headlines! That molding does look fine. The cockpit detail, too. It is annoying that they left off the necessary stores to build a proper Fencer. Perhaps they are releasing a Soviet stores set? Doesn't Hasegawa have one? Good review, John.
If they demand your loyalty, give them integrity; if they demand integrity, give them your loyalty.--Col John Boyd, USAF
“Any plan where you lose your hat is a bad plan.”
Texas, United States
Joined: November 14, 2007
KitMaker: 21 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 02:29 AM UTC
Thanks very much. Like I mentioned it's got great molding but what were they thinking?
betheyn
Senior Editordata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76419/7641917542674db2a7cc6d911a3e68b095aa6a58" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#019
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 14, 2004
KitMaker: 4,560 posts
AeroScale: 2,225 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 04:08 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Thanks very much. Like I mentioned it's got great molding but what were they thinking?
Well they are bringing the M version out, so they are making the most of the moulds by trying to get as many versions out as possible.
Why they couldn't have moulded the forward fuselage as a extra part or added the camera pods as an extra sprue, only Trumpeter know.
Andy
It's not the same, better, but not the same...
Texas, United States
Joined: November 14, 2007
KitMaker: 21 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 04:26 PM UTC
The forward fuselage is correct for an -MR, but there are no cameras for the bottom of the fuselage or under the port intake and no electronics pod. One extra sprue could have had those three items instead of a slew of weapons not used on the recon version packed in the box. I hope their -M version has the correct nose.
Sofiya, Bulgaria
Joined: November 08, 2011
KitMaker: 414 posts
AeroScale: 126 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 25, 2016 - 04:23 PM UTC
I think that the forward fuselage, especially the nose cone part is still wrong as on the 1/48 prototype. I hope that ModelSvit (or someone else) will release a better kit or Trumpeter will fix the issue on the 24M variant. Still no build examples of this one, it could look better when assembled. This aircraft should be extremely popular at this moment.
My modeling and news space:
https://redlinemodels.wordpress.com/
Texas, United States
Joined: November 14, 2007
KitMaker: 21 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 - 12:37 AM UTC
I'm working on a build of the sample kit - I hope to have it done in the next couple of weeks.