Hello all!
I just finished up an F4F Wildcat, and figured i would share it with you all.
World War II
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
F4F- recently completed.
melonhead
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: July 29, 2010
KitMaker: 662 posts
AeroScale: 14 posts
Joined: July 29, 2010
KitMaker: 662 posts
AeroScale: 14 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 02:30 AM UTC
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 03:26 AM UTC
Jesse,
Fine Wildcat! Maj.Robert E.Galer's?
Is that Trumpeter's 1/32 kit?
Fine Wildcat! Maj.Robert E.Galer's?
Is that Trumpeter's 1/32 kit?
Joel_W
Associate Editor
New York, United States
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 03:38 AM UTC
Jesse,
What a great build. your weathering is just superb, as it has the look and feel of a well used F4F.
The ChopperMan
What a great build. your weathering is just superb, as it has the look and feel of a well used F4F.
The ChopperMan
Scrodes
Ontario, Canada
Joined: July 22, 2012
KitMaker: 771 posts
AeroScale: 763 posts
Joined: July 22, 2012
KitMaker: 771 posts
AeroScale: 763 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 04:37 AM UTC
Beautiful, it's not very often that I see an early blue-grey scheme modeled looking as good as this.
chrism
United States
Joined: January 05, 2012
KitMaker: 160 posts
AeroScale: 156 posts
Joined: January 05, 2012
KitMaker: 160 posts
AeroScale: 156 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 04:44 AM UTC
Very nice Jesse!!
melonhead
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: July 29, 2010
KitMaker: 662 posts
AeroScale: 14 posts
Joined: July 29, 2010
KitMaker: 662 posts
AeroScale: 14 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 05:06 AM UTC
thanks everyone. yes fred, it is the trumpeter 1/32, but not necessarily built for any one pilot. i used whatever decals came with the kit, and mixmatched a little bit.. i ended up finding this at a LHS on clearance for 20 USD a couple years ago. i started it and let it sit for a long time (as many of my builds go), until i decided to start her back up and finally get it finished.
i got this one, obviously really cheap, but i havent ever done a very large scale like this. so, i went with it and did whatever detailing i could. ive only done 2 planes in my time, other than those i have done as a kid. im an armor guy that has started delving into every kit type out there.
i got this one, obviously really cheap, but i havent ever done a very large scale like this. so, i went with it and did whatever detailing i could. ive only done 2 planes in my time, other than those i have done as a kid. im an armor guy that has started delving into every kit type out there.
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 09:30 AM UTC
Jesse,
Very nice! Looks quite well-used.
Gaz
Very nice! Looks quite well-used.
Gaz
KosachevSergey
Russia
Joined: February 12, 2009
KitMaker: 91 posts
AeroScale: 90 posts
Joined: February 12, 2009
KitMaker: 91 posts
AeroScale: 90 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 02:21 PM UTC
Both ailerons down?
Sergey.
Sergey.
Joel_W
Associate Editor
New York, United States
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 09:32 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Both ailerons down?
Sergey.
Sergey,
We as modelers tend to display flying surfaces, in this case ailerons with one up and one down. To have one in the up position requires hydraulic pressure within its system. From what I've read, and at times seen, once that pressure dissipates, it wasn't all that uncommon to have both surfaces in a somewhat down attitude, or at least the up one in a more neutral position.
I'll be the 1st one to admit that I almost always display flying surfaces in positions as though there is the appropriate of hydraulic pressure.
Joel
melonhead
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: July 29, 2010
KitMaker: 662 posts
AeroScale: 14 posts
Joined: July 29, 2010
KitMaker: 662 posts
AeroScale: 14 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 09:57 PM UTC
they arent "modelled" that way. they both happen to be hinged. therefore, they are able to be freely moved up or down. i didnt want to glue them in place. Same with the rudder, elevator, and flaps. ultimately, i can move them to whatever position i would prefer since they arent permanent. for the sake of keeping my OCD sane, i usually keep things the same on both sides.
KosachevSergey
Russia
Joined: February 12, 2009
KitMaker: 91 posts
AeroScale: 90 posts
Joined: February 12, 2009
KitMaker: 91 posts
AeroScale: 90 posts
Posted: Friday, March 11, 2016 - 01:02 AM UTC
[quote]
But not in this case, hydraulic pressure doesn't play any role here. Wildcat's ailerons were mechanically linked, and the only way they can be both down, when wings are folded. That's why there's no one photo with deployed wings and both ailerons down, and no one photo with folded wings and ailerons in other position than both down.
Sergey.
Quoted Text
We as modelers tend to display flying surfaces, in this case ailerons with one up and one down. To have one in the up position requires hydraulic pressure within its system. From what I've read, and at times seen, once that pressure dissipates, it wasn't all that uncommon to have both surfaces in a somewhat down attitude, or at least the up one in a more neutral position.
But not in this case, hydraulic pressure doesn't play any role here. Wildcat's ailerons were mechanically linked, and the only way they can be both down, when wings are folded. That's why there's no one photo with deployed wings and both ailerons down, and no one photo with folded wings and ailerons in other position than both down.
Sergey.
greif8
Bayern, Germany
Joined: January 17, 2006
KitMaker: 673 posts
AeroScale: 492 posts
Joined: January 17, 2006
KitMaker: 673 posts
AeroScale: 492 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 12, 2016 - 02:40 PM UTC
Superb build Jesse. The fading and weathering are excellent.
Kilo_Uniform
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: July 03, 2015
KitMaker: 280 posts
AeroScale: 141 posts
Joined: July 03, 2015
KitMaker: 280 posts
AeroScale: 141 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 12, 2016 - 03:46 PM UTC
Excellent work Jesse - very nice model. Weathering looks spot on. Congratulations.
Regards,
Kobus
Regards,
Kobus
Posted: Monday, March 14, 2016 - 01:32 AM UTC
Hi Jesse
Nice build! I really like the weathering.
Sergey's quite right on the ailerons, and I hit a similar problem with Dragon's Bf 109E - all the etched hinges are just too loose for the control surfaces. My thought at the time was simply to carefully apply a little liquid cement to lock them - but, if you really want to keep them positionable, perhaps a drop of something like Gator's glue on the hinges themselves might give the extra friction needed to hold them in the position you want.
All the best
Rowan
Nice build! I really like the weathering.
Sergey's quite right on the ailerons, and I hit a similar problem with Dragon's Bf 109E - all the etched hinges are just too loose for the control surfaces. My thought at the time was simply to carefully apply a little liquid cement to lock them - but, if you really want to keep them positionable, perhaps a drop of something like Gator's glue on the hinges themselves might give the extra friction needed to hold them in the position you want.
All the best
Rowan