Early Aviation
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
News
Copper State Models: Sopwith 5F.1 DolphinPosted: Saturday, May 07, 2016 - 12:03 AM UTC
Edgar Liepinsh of Copper State Models has sent us details of their brand new injection moulded 1:48 Sopwith 5F.1 Dolphin.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Posted: Saturday, May 07, 2016 - 12:15 AM UTC
AEG C.IV and N.I Aviatik - yes!
Jessie_C
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Joined: September 03, 2009
KitMaker: 6,965 posts
AeroScale: 6,247 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 07, 2016 - 12:35 AM UTC
Okay, who wants to buy a second-hand Blue Max Dolphin? Never started...
Louis
Bas-Rhin, France
Joined: May 21, 2006
KitMaker: 472 posts
AeroScale: 471 posts
Joined: May 21, 2006
KitMaker: 472 posts
AeroScale: 471 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 07, 2016 - 02:55 AM UTC
Youpi!
ULIX-VM
Puerto Rico
Joined: February 22, 2016
KitMaker: 834 posts
AeroScale: 183 posts
Joined: February 22, 2016
KitMaker: 834 posts
AeroScale: 183 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 07, 2016 - 03:16 AM UTC
state of the arts in ww1.
Posted: Saturday, May 07, 2016 - 03:35 AM UTC
Hi again
For those who read the story early, Edgar has confirmed the prices as:
CSM 1026 - 28 EUR
CSM 1026 Premium - 39.67 EUR
All the best
Rowan
For those who read the story early, Edgar has confirmed the prices as:
CSM 1026 - 28 EUR
CSM 1026 Premium - 39.67 EUR
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Saturday, May 14, 2016 - 12:25 PM UTC
Hi again
The new Dolphins are now ready for sale through Copper State's webstore:
CSM 1026 - $34.00
CSM 1026 Premium - $48.00
Meanwhile, the classic Datafile #54 is available from Albatros Productions:
All the best
Rowan
The new Dolphins are now ready for sale through Copper State's webstore:
CSM 1026 - $34.00
CSM 1026 Premium - $48.00
Meanwhile, the classic Datafile #54 is available from Albatros Productions:
All the best
Rowan
StukaJr
California, United States
Joined: April 26, 2010
KitMaker: 346 posts
AeroScale: 292 posts
Joined: April 26, 2010
KitMaker: 346 posts
AeroScale: 292 posts
Posted: Monday, May 16, 2016 - 11:45 AM UTC
This may get me working in 1/48 scale again!
And hate to even ask if there will be US Distributorship - rather ironic...
And hate to even ask if there will be US Distributorship - rather ironic...
Posted: Thursday, May 19, 2016 - 01:57 PM UTC
Quoted Text
This may get me working in 1/48 scale again!
And hate to even ask if there will be US Distributorship - rather ironic...
Hi Ivan
I should imagine the kits will be available in the US - Hannants are showing them in the UK (although not in stock yet).
Meanwhile, the Premium Edition has just arrived direct from Copper State in Latvia:
I'll get cracking on it as soon as I can.
All the best
Rowan
Familyman
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: January 11, 2007
KitMaker: 88 posts
AeroScale: 87 posts
Joined: January 11, 2007
KitMaker: 88 posts
AeroScale: 87 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 21, 2016 - 01:10 PM UTC
Mine came by mail from Latvia few days ago. It looks cool!
I do not have any reliable scale drawings of Dolphin yet, but have any of you guys measured the kit parts? Especially I wonder about the wheels. They seem to be a bit small. Should Dolphin have the same size of Palmers as Camel and Pup?
Mikko
I do not have any reliable scale drawings of Dolphin yet, but have any of you guys measured the kit parts? Especially I wonder about the wheels. They seem to be a bit small. Should Dolphin have the same size of Palmers as Camel and Pup?
Mikko
Posted: Saturday, May 21, 2016 - 08:05 PM UTC
Hi Mikko
Neat!
The wheels match William Wylam's vintage drawings and those published in Windsock Datafile 54.
I've compared the kit broadly against both sets in my Review. The kit's tail matches Wylam's plans best, so it'll be interesting to learn if specialists have an opinion over which are the most reliable.
All the best
Rowan
Neat!
The wheels match William Wylam's vintage drawings and those published in Windsock Datafile 54.
I've compared the kit broadly against both sets in my Review. The kit's tail matches Wylam's plans best, so it'll be interesting to learn if specialists have an opinion over which are the most reliable.
All the best
Rowan
PiotrM
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: May 21, 2010
KitMaker: 16 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Joined: May 21, 2010
KitMaker: 16 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 - 02:58 PM UTC
Hi All, Yesterday I became happy owner of the Premium Version 1/48 Sopwith Dolphin model. Looks great!
After close inspection and compare with sources I see that:
Three versions are build: Mk.I, Mk.II and Mk.III (all have differences around engine area - and it is clearly seen);
All these versions have different producers: Sopwith Aviation Co., Hooper & Co., Darracq Motor Engineering Co...
Each of these companies have apply its form of detailing and painting machines + Each companies produced Dolphins in batches (each batch have individual décor/finish) + prototypes/initial production machines (with front and wing radiators)...
It give a huge range of build the model possibilities and I can't even imagine that someone try to make good this model without carefully studding the sources!
After choose paint/version, the model probably need to add some additional parts (such as the side empty link gutters, bomb carrier, under wing flare mounts etc.)...
"The Sopwith Dolphin in RFC, RNAS, RAF and Polish Service" is the best source (I got my copy from publisher - thank you Cross & Cockade International!)
I hope that this little information put some more light into the Sopwith model for future builders.
All the best. Piotr
BTW. I wonder if the company is thinking about further versions of the model?
After close inspection and compare with sources I see that:
Three versions are build: Mk.I, Mk.II and Mk.III (all have differences around engine area - and it is clearly seen);
All these versions have different producers: Sopwith Aviation Co., Hooper & Co., Darracq Motor Engineering Co...
Each of these companies have apply its form of detailing and painting machines + Each companies produced Dolphins in batches (each batch have individual décor/finish) + prototypes/initial production machines (with front and wing radiators)...
It give a huge range of build the model possibilities and I can't even imagine that someone try to make good this model without carefully studding the sources!
After choose paint/version, the model probably need to add some additional parts (such as the side empty link gutters, bomb carrier, under wing flare mounts etc.)...
"The Sopwith Dolphin in RFC, RNAS, RAF and Polish Service" is the best source (I got my copy from publisher - thank you Cross & Cockade International!)
I hope that this little information put some more light into the Sopwith model for future builders.
All the best. Piotr
BTW. I wonder if the company is thinking about further versions of the model?
CaptnTommy
Connecticut, United States
Joined: October 26, 2009
KitMaker: 424 posts
AeroScale: 389 posts
Joined: October 26, 2009
KitMaker: 424 posts
AeroScale: 389 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 06, 2016 - 08:28 PM UTC
1) Rowan; On Wylam's Drawings I met him once, way back in the 20th century, nice gentleman. You can still get the drawings from Model Airplane News (even scale sizes). I thought the Dolphin was one of his best.
By the way, He told me, the early Aurora WWI aircraft were, dead-on matches to the drawings, as they were designed to the best drawings of the 1040s and 1950s and they consulted him. Even the Gotha was based off a Wylam drawing.
2)Wouldn't is be nice if ICM or one of the other figure makers come out with a set of SEATED pilot figures for us gentlepeople, who would like to "man up" their models. Airfix "God bless them" gives us pilots. (they may all look the same, but in WWI, both sides used or captured near identical flying outfits) Now with computer mold making (as with Airfix) making a good looking pilot, is much simpler and repeatable.)
Enjoy
Captn Tommy
Posted: Saturday, October 08, 2016 - 12:40 AM UTC
Hi Tom
It was the reprint of Wylam's drawings in Volume 1 of Model Airplane News's compilations that I consulted. I love his drawings - he was a true artist and they have a degree of "life" that's lacking from most modern scale plans I've seen.
@ Piotr - Nice one! I think you're really going to love the kit!
All the best
Rowan
It was the reprint of Wylam's drawings in Volume 1 of Model Airplane News's compilations that I consulted. I love his drawings - he was a true artist and they have a degree of "life" that's lacking from most modern scale plans I've seen.
@ Piotr - Nice one! I think you're really going to love the kit!
All the best
Rowan
PiotrM
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: May 21, 2010
KitMaker: 16 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Joined: May 21, 2010
KitMaker: 16 posts
AeroScale: 15 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 09, 2016 - 08:30 PM UTC
Hi Merlin
Yes I start to like this kit!
The biggest problem I think, is in horizontal stabilizer length.
Each source/drawings show different size - Big mess I see here.
When I copied Sopwith Camel factory drawings from RAF Museum, accidentally I make some drawings to the Sopwith Dolphin.
Unfortunately I can't find these photocopies... Maybe someone known, what is exactly the stabilizer dimension?:|
All the best
Piotr
Yes I start to like this kit!
The biggest problem I think, is in horizontal stabilizer length.
Each source/drawings show different size - Big mess I see here.
When I copied Sopwith Camel factory drawings from RAF Museum, accidentally I make some drawings to the Sopwith Dolphin.
Unfortunately I can't find these photocopies... Maybe someone known, what is exactly the stabilizer dimension?:|
All the best
Piotr
Posted: Monday, October 10, 2016 - 08:44 PM UTC
Hi Piotr
Yes, I noted the discrepancy over the tailplane in the review. The kit matches the Wylam drawings well, but is way off the Datafile. If you ever do find your RAF Museum photocopies, you may be able to answer which plans to go by on that point.
All the best
Rowan
Yes, I noted the discrepancy over the tailplane in the review. The kit matches the Wylam drawings well, but is way off the Datafile. If you ever do find your RAF Museum photocopies, you may be able to answer which plans to go by on that point.
All the best
Rowan
CaptnTommy
Connecticut, United States
Joined: October 26, 2009
KitMaker: 424 posts
AeroScale: 389 posts
Joined: October 26, 2009
KitMaker: 424 posts
AeroScale: 389 posts
Posted: Monday, October 10, 2016 - 11:41 PM UTC
There is a possibility that both stab Dimensions are correct. I am searching some data I have (or going to as I am in work at lunch) to see if there are differences (maybe) between manufacturers or early and late production. Let you know either way.
Captn Tommy
Mistakes can happen, as long as Icebergs are not involved. – T.P. Anderson
Captn Tommy
Mistakes can happen, as long as Icebergs are not involved. – T.P. Anderson
Posted: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 - 12:27 AM UTC
Cheers Tom
I'm a long way off tackling the tail in my build, but it'd be great to pin down. If needs be, I'll make a new one, Harry Woodman-style.
All the best
Rowan
I'm a long way off tackling the tail in my build, but it'd be great to pin down. If needs be, I'll make a new one, Harry Woodman-style.
All the best
Rowan
flightline
Australia
Joined: March 05, 2010
KitMaker: 2 posts
AeroScale: 2 posts
Joined: March 05, 2010
KitMaker: 2 posts
AeroScale: 2 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 01, 2017 - 07:48 AM UTC
CAVEAT EMPTOR !!!
I eagerly awaited my premium edition of the Copper State Dolphin - It is not a cheap kit over here - I paid nearly $Au100
As avid scratch-builder in a modelling market (Australia) which is significantly more expensive than the UK Europe or the US, it's always a struggle to justify spending big on something small like this but the Reviews persuaded me it was worth it.
When you do a bit of ground up scratch-building reliable plans are where you start, so more out of habit than any concern I eagerly snipped the fuselage halves off their sprue and laid the plastic over the Datafile plans.
At that point my enthusiasm wilted very badly.
When you lay the Copper State Dolphin fuselage down over the Datafile # 54 drawings (drawn by Ian Stair and Colin Owers) you will discover, (if you accpet the accuracy of the Datafile drawings and I do), that the Copper State fuselage is very significantly under-sized. It is far too narrow - fully 3.5 mm - through the cross sectional stations from the front engine mounts right through to the rear of the cockpit.
Strangely but thankfully the wing panels, both as to width root to tip and rib spacing, are true to the plans.
With that rude shock under my belt, I stated looking more closely
I happen to have the Blue Max kit, the Wylam drawings, (which appeared in the old Air Age Publishing collection Scale Aircraft Drawings Vol 1 WW I ) plus the original 1/72 scale Drawings by Peter Gray (published in Aircraft Archive -Aircraft of WW I - Vol 1) as well
While the new Copper State kit agrees with the Wylam drawings, it does not agree with either the Datafile or the Peter Gray drawings
I do not have access to factory drawings but if its a battle between the accuracy of Wylam vs Peter Gray, Ian Stair and Colin Owers I will take any of the latter three over Wylam
While the much maligned Blue Max Dolphin is a fraction too wide at 1.5 mm over-size through the above-mentioned cross-sectional stations, it is actually more accurate than it's far more modern cousin.
The Blue Max edition is also far more easily fixed with some judicious sanding down - the fuselage top deck will be a bit more of a fiddle to fit but then it is already.
The good people at Copper State would not be the first to have been lead down the garden path by a set of Wylam drawings - The inaccuracy of Wylam's (often very pretty and heavily detailed) drawings has been well known for years. A search of the net will reveal several threads dealing with this unhappy topic.
The next question is whether the problem with the Copper State kit is fixable - The short answer is that it is, but it will require some old-fashioned cunning and real modelling skill. I sincerely regret to say that this is not quite the "project" I had in mind when I shelled out $100 bucks.
With an "under-nourished" fuselage you will also find the kit supplied Hispano engine is undersized ( that shrinkage was necessary to ensure the prominent heads of the engine ended up in the right position to take the exhausts. Some of the cockpit fittings and fixtures will also need a close look to ensure
I eagerly awaited my premium edition of the Copper State Dolphin - It is not a cheap kit over here - I paid nearly $Au100
As avid scratch-builder in a modelling market (Australia) which is significantly more expensive than the UK Europe or the US, it's always a struggle to justify spending big on something small like this but the Reviews persuaded me it was worth it.
When you do a bit of ground up scratch-building reliable plans are where you start, so more out of habit than any concern I eagerly snipped the fuselage halves off their sprue and laid the plastic over the Datafile plans.
At that point my enthusiasm wilted very badly.
When you lay the Copper State Dolphin fuselage down over the Datafile # 54 drawings (drawn by Ian Stair and Colin Owers) you will discover, (if you accpet the accuracy of the Datafile drawings and I do), that the Copper State fuselage is very significantly under-sized. It is far too narrow - fully 3.5 mm - through the cross sectional stations from the front engine mounts right through to the rear of the cockpit.
Strangely but thankfully the wing panels, both as to width root to tip and rib spacing, are true to the plans.
With that rude shock under my belt, I stated looking more closely
I happen to have the Blue Max kit, the Wylam drawings, (which appeared in the old Air Age Publishing collection Scale Aircraft Drawings Vol 1 WW I ) plus the original 1/72 scale Drawings by Peter Gray (published in Aircraft Archive -Aircraft of WW I - Vol 1) as well
While the new Copper State kit agrees with the Wylam drawings, it does not agree with either the Datafile or the Peter Gray drawings
I do not have access to factory drawings but if its a battle between the accuracy of Wylam vs Peter Gray, Ian Stair and Colin Owers I will take any of the latter three over Wylam
While the much maligned Blue Max Dolphin is a fraction too wide at 1.5 mm over-size through the above-mentioned cross-sectional stations, it is actually more accurate than it's far more modern cousin.
The Blue Max edition is also far more easily fixed with some judicious sanding down - the fuselage top deck will be a bit more of a fiddle to fit but then it is already.
The good people at Copper State would not be the first to have been lead down the garden path by a set of Wylam drawings - The inaccuracy of Wylam's (often very pretty and heavily detailed) drawings has been well known for years. A search of the net will reveal several threads dealing with this unhappy topic.
The next question is whether the problem with the Copper State kit is fixable - The short answer is that it is, but it will require some old-fashioned cunning and real modelling skill. I sincerely regret to say that this is not quite the "project" I had in mind when I shelled out $100 bucks.
With an "under-nourished" fuselage you will also find the kit supplied Hispano engine is undersized ( that shrinkage was necessary to ensure the prominent heads of the engine ended up in the right position to take the exhausts. Some of the cockpit fittings and fixtures will also need a close look to ensure
JackFlash
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Friday, January 13, 2017 - 07:57 PM UTC
David, you have a keen eye for details.
flightline
Australia
Joined: March 05, 2010
KitMaker: 2 posts
AeroScale: 2 posts
Joined: March 05, 2010
KitMaker: 2 posts
AeroScale: 2 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 12, 2017 - 05:19 AM UTC
Hi Steve
I hope the post was not hyper-critical of Copper State
I understand how they got sucked in but not why ...
I also really hesitate to criticise anyone servicing the WW 1 aircraft modelling niche ... there are as you know so many subjects worthy of attention which we may never see unless we scratch-build ourselves or a manufacturer is prepared to bite the bullet, but this effort by Copper State is a real "clanger"
Having said that I recently acquired their Caudron GIV and have to say that they seem to have done a much better job of that one !
David
I hope the post was not hyper-critical of Copper State
I understand how they got sucked in but not why ...
I also really hesitate to criticise anyone servicing the WW 1 aircraft modelling niche ... there are as you know so many subjects worthy of attention which we may never see unless we scratch-build ourselves or a manufacturer is prepared to bite the bullet, but this effort by Copper State is a real "clanger"
Having said that I recently acquired their Caudron GIV and have to say that they seem to have done a much better job of that one !
David