SgtRam
Editor-at-Largedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76419/7641917542674db2a7cc6d911a3e68b095aa6a58" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#197
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
AeroScale: 511 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - 07:01 PM UTC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddc6f/ddc6f93cdf0e0232db930b18fa8582407382a950" alt=""
Hasegawa has released a 1/32 scale Spitfire that includes a figure of Douglas Bader, and here Jonathan Bellos has a look in the box.
Read the ReviewIf you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
bill_c
Campaigns AdministratorNew Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
AeroScale: 1,198 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - 01:29 AM UTC
Thanks for the review. Hasegawa seems to have all but given up the 32-scale arena to Tamiya, Revell, and others. I'm not sure this qualifies as something new, but it shows they haven't forgotten the scale.
JPTRR
Managing Editordata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76419/7641917542674db2a7cc6d911a3e68b095aa6a58" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#051
Tennessee, United States
Joined: December 21, 2002
KitMaker: 7,772 posts
AeroScale: 3,175 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - 06:03 AM UTC
Is this Hasegawa tooling?
If they demand your loyalty, give them integrity; if they demand integrity, give them your loyalty.--Col John Boyd, USAF
“Any plan where you lose your hat is a bad plan.”
betheyn
Senior Editordata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76419/7641917542674db2a7cc6d911a3e68b095aa6a58" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#019
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 14, 2004
KitMaker: 4,560 posts
AeroScale: 2,225 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 21, 2017 - 02:12 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Is this Hasegawa tooling?
Yep, and quite an old one I believe, which has been reboxed with new parts.
Andy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06ab/d06ab722307f5efe356b0d378839d8800d636f8d" alt=""
It's not the same, better, but not the same...