A look at the new Classic Airframes kit was something of a surprise... I think it''s the first time I''ve found a kit where the resin parts fit much better than the main plastic components...
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
General Aircraft
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
REVIEW
Hawker Sea HawkPosted: Sunday, July 04, 2004 - 06:10 AM UTC
CRS
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 04, 2004 - 06:29 AM UTC
Oh my those gaps do look pretty awful. Good luck.
Surprise a Merlin review and it don't have propellers ?
:-)
Surprise a Merlin review and it don't have propellers ?
:-)
Posted: Sunday, July 04, 2004 - 06:45 AM UTC
Hi Chuck
Yes... I thought the plastic parts looked pretty good on the sprues, but I had my suspicions about how well the fuselage joint would work in practice.
It was only when I put the tail halves together that I realised they were doing a fair impersonation of bananas.
If ever proof were needed that test fits are important for in-box reviews...
Darn it! The propeller!... I knew I'd missed something!
All the best
Rowan
Yes... I thought the plastic parts looked pretty good on the sprues, but I had my suspicions about how well the fuselage joint would work in practice.
It was only when I put the tail halves together that I realised they were doing a fair impersonation of bananas.
If ever proof were needed that test fits are important for in-box reviews...
Darn it! The propeller!... I knew I'd missed something!
All the best
Rowan
CRS
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 04, 2004 - 07:44 AM UTC
Rowan,
After a second look, I think that your build review; if you do one, should devote some space to how you over came the defects.
You know in 1/72 that might not be so bad but in 1/48 that is really bad.
After a second look, I think that your build review; if you do one, should devote some space to how you over came the defects.
You know in 1/72 that might not be so bad but in 1/48 that is really bad.
OllieC-FWOL
Quebec, Canada
Joined: March 31, 2004
KitMaker: 446 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: March 31, 2004
KitMaker: 446 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 04, 2004 - 10:05 AM UTC
I think it won't be long before we start seeing build reviews of that baby on all the major modeling websites.
I might buy one, even if it's not a Canuck aircraft!
I might buy one, even if it's not a Canuck aircraft!
Posted: Sunday, July 04, 2004 - 06:57 PM UTC
Hi again Chuck
Yes, that's a good idea.
I doubt I'll manage to do a full build before the kit appears on other sites. I've got two campaign builds on the go and I expect Ollie's right... dedicated reviewers are probably already at work out there.
Apparently a few Sea Hawks did fly with the Australian and Canadian navies, although they didn't enter full squadron service, so there's an extra extra excuse for Ollie to get one!
All the best
Rowan
Yes, that's a good idea.
I doubt I'll manage to do a full build before the kit appears on other sites. I've got two campaign builds on the go and I expect Ollie's right... dedicated reviewers are probably already at work out there.
Apparently a few Sea Hawks did fly with the Australian and Canadian navies, although they didn't enter full squadron service, so there's an extra extra excuse for Ollie to get one!
All the best
Rowan
OllieC-FWOL
Quebec, Canada
Joined: March 31, 2004
KitMaker: 446 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: March 31, 2004
KitMaker: 446 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, July 05, 2004 - 12:45 AM UTC
RCN Seahwawk, eh?
I'll have to check that one. I have a book on the RCN and I never saw the shadow of one in it!
I'll have to check that one. I have a book on the RCN and I never saw the shadow of one in it!
Posted: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 - 08:31 AM UTC
Hi Ollie
It would be good to learn more about this. All I've got is a quote from the old Profile Publication:
"... a few ex-Fleet Air Arm Sea Hawks were transferred to Australia and some flew from H.M.A.S. Sydney, while a small number also served with the Royal Canadian Navy; nevertheless the number was so small that the type did not enter full squadron service, and some were later returned to the United Kingdom."
All the best
Rowan
It would be good to learn more about this. All I've got is a quote from the old Profile Publication:
"... a few ex-Fleet Air Arm Sea Hawks were transferred to Australia and some flew from H.M.A.S. Sydney, while a small number also served with the Royal Canadian Navy; nevertheless the number was so small that the type did not enter full squadron service, and some were later returned to the United Kingdom."
All the best
Rowan
OllieC-FWOL
Quebec, Canada
Joined: March 31, 2004
KitMaker: 446 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: March 31, 2004
KitMaker: 446 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 - 08:52 AM UTC
Cheers Merlin.
I'll dig into that!
I'll dig into that!