Just can't understand why there's no seatbelt in this kit? That's all it needs.......Mike T
General Aircraft
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
Finished Eduard Airco DH-2
modelguy2
Ohio, United States
Joined: March 09, 2002
KitMaker: 818 posts
AeroScale: 137 posts
Joined: March 09, 2002
KitMaker: 818 posts
AeroScale: 137 posts
Posted: Friday, April 01, 2005 - 05:47 PM UTC
Posted: Friday, April 01, 2005 - 07:13 PM UTC
Mike absolutly superb, what have you used for the rigging. This looks like a fun build, I was thinking of getting one, how is it to build?
You must enter this into the Model of the Month for April. I'm just about to start the thread
Mal
You must enter this into the Model of the Month for April. I'm just about to start the thread
Mal
Posted: Friday, April 01, 2005 - 07:37 PM UTC
that looks great! is it a 1/72? ive been building the profipack version of this kit on and off for about two years, how did you paint your propeller, ive still got to do the one on mine, and was going to use some paint and grain, which is ok but can look a bit like its just painted brown. good job on the rigging, i got mine half rigged before i put the top wing on, then had to adjust the struts to make it fit, that in turn threw all the rigging out, some snapped and others hung loose, at this point the kit went back in the box for 9 months!
edit i started mine for the age of aces campaign so i opened the box on july 14 2003!
edit i started mine for the age of aces campaign so i opened the box on july 14 2003!
Lipton
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 52 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 52 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Friday, April 01, 2005 - 08:17 PM UTC
Very nice build Sir. I really like the rigging and paint finish.
Just my observation. The way the propeller blades are angled, looks like the prop is attached the wrong way. Or its just me...
-Lipton-
Just my observation. The way the propeller blades are angled, looks like the prop is attached the wrong way. Or its just me...
-Lipton-
modelguy2
Ohio, United States
Joined: March 09, 2002
KitMaker: 818 posts
AeroScale: 137 posts
Joined: March 09, 2002
KitMaker: 818 posts
AeroScale: 137 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 02, 2005 - 04:28 AM UTC
1/48. The rigging is .004 carbon fibre measure to fit, cut the fiber and glue it in place; the prop was painted wood tan, futured, then streaked with thinned raw umber and it only goes on 1 way so if it's backwards blame Eduard. If you want the fiber I sell it in tubes of 24" long sections. A tube lasts me through 65 plane/ship builds-a year's worth to me. Many years worth to the average builder. $75.
Posted: Saturday, April 02, 2005 - 07:03 AM UTC
Hi Mike
That's superb!
I've got the kit and was going to do an in-box review... any chance you could do a full-build review? It'd be much bettter!
All the best
Rowan
That's superb!
I've got the kit and was going to do an in-box review... any chance you could do a full-build review? It'd be much bettter!
All the best
Rowan
woltersk
Utah, United States
Joined: May 27, 2003
KitMaker: 1,026 posts
AeroScale: 215 posts
Joined: May 27, 2003
KitMaker: 1,026 posts
AeroScale: 215 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 02, 2005 - 08:32 AM UTC
Mike that is superb.
I like your technique for rigging. Sounds easier than thread.
The prop looks like a work of art. But I have to agree with Lipton--it looks backwards. If it spins towards the leading edge it will act as in impellor and the plane will fly backwards, if you turn it around it will look funny since the blade shape is not asymmetrical! But that’s Eduards for ya.
Definitely should be entered in MoM.
I like your technique for rigging. Sounds easier than thread.
The prop looks like a work of art. But I have to agree with Lipton--it looks backwards. If it spins towards the leading edge it will act as in impellor and the plane will fly backwards, if you turn it around it will look funny since the blade shape is not asymmetrical! But that’s Eduards for ya.
Definitely should be entered in MoM.
modelguy2
Ohio, United States
Joined: March 09, 2002
KitMaker: 818 posts
AeroScale: 137 posts
Joined: March 09, 2002
KitMaker: 818 posts
AeroScale: 137 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 02, 2005 - 09:46 AM UTC
Thanks for the comments guys. Found this photo:
Eduards looks right to me? As far as a review goes? Eduards kits keep getting better. No problems with this kit what so ever. Like I said-just needs a seatbelt now this one on the other hand (Hi-Tech AEG).......
Eduards looks right to me? As far as a review goes? Eduards kits keep getting better. No problems with this kit what so ever. Like I said-just needs a seatbelt now this one on the other hand (Hi-Tech AEG).......