I'm on the hunt for a new kit, a JU 88 in 1/48 scale. Is there anything besides the Dragon Kit, which I heard bad things about, bad tooling was the review I saw?
I'm on a big WWII bomber kick right now.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
JU 88 in 1/48 Scale
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f952/5f952d9804f3207bdee7a59383b200876b852dd4" alt=""
Dhepee
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e408/6e40866cd5f1dc278a933590b321a9e72e13f6eb" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: October 16, 2003
KitMaker: 50 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbfee/cbfee4fdb169525ace0070f4c610775dce2343da" alt="2nd Lieutenant"
Posted: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - 12:56 PM UTC
Posted: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 - 01:08 PM UTC
Hi Dhepee,
I built the DML/Dragon/Pro-Modeler/Revell-Monogram /1/48 JU-88A-4. Unless you want to got vacuform, it is the only choice.
The complaint is that, like Hasegawa is now doing with their P-40 series, the kit is modular so they can make several marks with a basic sprue set.
I found it mainly went together well, the only bad parts being the cockpit section of the fuselage mating with the rear fuselage, and the wing extentions. Both need filler. Otherwise, I thought it was a good kit. Not much, as I recall.
My JU-88
I built the DML/Dragon/Pro-Modeler/Revell-Monogram /1/48 JU-88A-4. Unless you want to got vacuform, it is the only choice.
The complaint is that, like Hasegawa is now doing with their P-40 series, the kit is modular so they can make several marks with a basic sprue set.
I found it mainly went together well, the only bad parts being the cockpit section of the fuselage mating with the rear fuselage, and the wing extentions. Both need filler. Otherwise, I thought it was a good kit. Not much, as I recall.
My JU-88
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f952/5f952d9804f3207bdee7a59383b200876b852dd4" alt=""
Dhepee
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e408/6e40866cd5f1dc278a933590b321a9e72e13f6eb" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: October 16, 2003
KitMaker: 50 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbfee/cbfee4fdb169525ace0070f4c610775dce2343da" alt="2nd Lieutenant"
Posted: Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 12:57 PM UTC
Thanks. Yours looks good.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/505f6/505f683af526bbfdf8008bc08beb151802ad1309" alt=""
modelcitizen62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e408/6e40866cd5f1dc278a933590b321a9e72e13f6eb" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 326 posts
AeroScale: 273 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13a53/13a53342ffbe6bb47ae8b43bb1175d7d138d1473" alt=""
Posted: Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 02:39 PM UTC
Hey Dhepee and Fred !
Fred's right, unless you manage to uncover one of those old Hobbycraft Ju- 88's that are rare as hen's teeth.
I'd started my Pro-Modeller 88A a month or so ago (which means it'll get done around 2009) and I found that the tip I'd read in several places - gluing each extension half to its corresponding wing half before joining the wing halves - makes the seam filling a lot more manageable. You don't have to deal with steps in the wing-tip joint that way.
Also, the cockpit gives a fairly positive alignment for the forward fuselage halves.
HTH
Fred's right, unless you manage to uncover one of those old Hobbycraft Ju- 88's that are rare as hen's teeth.
I'd started my Pro-Modeller 88A a month or so ago (which means it'll get done around 2009) and I found that the tip I'd read in several places - gluing each extension half to its corresponding wing half before joining the wing halves - makes the seam filling a lot more manageable. You don't have to deal with steps in the wing-tip joint that way.
Also, the cockpit gives a fairly positive alignment for the forward fuselage halves.
HTH
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02ab8/02ab8d6f0da49bfb1fba177977b06f728364303b" alt=""
Posted: Friday, October 21, 2005 - 09:26 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Fred's right, unless you manage to uncover one of those old Hobbycraft Ju- 88's that are rare as hen's teeth.
Hi there
I've got an old Hobbycraft Ju 88 stashed away... I wouldn't recommend hunting for one - it's rough! :-) :-)
All the best
Rowan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c001/4c00123a85458f2f5cb79ee0d5dd41edd85d7aa3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55c66/55c66d6ed6c2df2850da0399d06189f157f8d2ce" alt=""
JU-88c6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad72e/ad72e25aa9ccec75d6cc720e95aae0acb96dcfe8" alt="_VISITCOMMUNITY"
Joined: October 21, 2005
KitMaker: 38 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 01:28 AM UTC
Im currently building a 1/48 JU88 at the moment its made by monogram and i rate it as a fairly good kit i only really had prob with gaps between the wing and fusulage everything else went smooth at the painting stage now will post picks when done
John
John
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec907/ec907051c397636db563a582113e2bf5243c96a3" alt=""
![]() |