_GOTOBOTTOM
General Aircraft
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
I've got an F question
mat
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Limburg, Netherlands
Joined: November 18, 2003
KitMaker: 894 posts
AeroScale: 42 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 05:23 AM UTC
Hi,

after building ships and armour (targets as some wingy-thingy builders might call them) for a long time I have started on an F-15. I know there is a logical explanation why planes are called F-14, F-15, F-16 and F-18. But what happend to the F-17, or the F-13. Did they skip one number to gain a larger technological advance over the Russians much faster :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) . Don't me, that was supposed to be a joke.

cheers,

Mat
Davester444
_VISITCOMMUNITY
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: March 09, 2005
KitMaker: 850 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 05:30 AM UTC
There was already a plane, though much older, called the F13. Maybe this is why they skipped the number, or because they thought it would be unlucky . As for the F17, maybe they thought it would get confused with the F117 Nighthawk? I'm just guessing about these, though.

Dave
CRS
_VISITCOMMUNITY
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 05:44 AM UTC
Nice try Dave, but the "missing" numbers are usually ones assigned to prototypes that didn't make it to flightline service - F-13 was XF-13 Ryan "VertiJet" and the F-17 was YF-17 "Cobra" Northrop design submitted to compete with the F-16, of course the F-16 won, but the YF-17 design was modified and became the F-18 "Hornet" :-)

Seems they don't have a problem recycling numbers as I know of that least 3 aircraft carrying the F-15 designation that saw USAF service :-)
Spuds
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Georgia, United States
Joined: August 31, 2002
KitMaker: 393 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 06:01 AM UTC
Easyoff, you couldn't stand it, could you. The temptation was just too great. :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
CRS
_VISITCOMMUNITY
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 06:07 AM UTC
Easy fellas, it started as a good honest question, get too far out there and this will have to go Bye Bye.
EasyOff
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 926 posts
AeroScale: 27 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 07:12 AM UTC
Ok, Ok, I deleted, it, silly me.
Defcon1
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Illinois, United States
Joined: May 03, 2005
KitMaker: 174 posts
AeroScale: 132 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 07:21 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Seems they don't have a problem recycling numbers as I know of that least 3 aircraft carrying the F-15 designation that saw USAF service :-)



Hello Chuck. Sorry for OT. What is the other F-15? Just curious. I know of the F-15 Eagle/Strike Eagle and F-15 Reporter. Thanks.

Cheers,
David.
CRS
_VISITCOMMUNITY
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 07:23 AM UTC
David - One version of the P-38 was reassigned as an F-15 and the reworked P-61 "Reporter" was assigned F-15
Davester444
_VISITCOMMUNITY
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: March 09, 2005
KitMaker: 850 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 07:26 AM UTC
*Hits self over head*

I thought it was a reasonable guess... :-)
That's the first thing I learnt today (which says something about how much attention I was paying at school).
CRS
_VISITCOMMUNITY
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 07:32 AM UTC
As a partial picture of the "missing" numbers check this out http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/Fdesig.html
not all inclusive as some prototypes are missing

Some P's were redesigned F's :-) If they lasted that long.
AJLaFleche
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
AeroScale: 328 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 07:32 AM UTC
F=fighter or interceptor role. In the early 60's, the Air Force and Navy combined their two systems of nomenclature to a single one. Things are not as clear, however as all that. The initial "F" series was a continuation of the "P" series of "Pursuit" aircraft from pre-war years. The F-111 has consistently been used as a bomber or electronics platform. The F-117 was introduced wellafter the numbering system had been recycled back to single digits due to its top secret stealth properties. The A-6 was a bomber, while the A-4 was a light attack aircraft and the A-10 is a ground attack aircraft and the A-12 is the interceptor daddy to the SR-71.
The Navy's first system identified manufacturer, type, and how many of thattype had been developed by that manufaturer and variant.
Thus the Corsair was the F4U (Fourth fighter accepted from Vought.) but was not at all related to the F4F (fourth fighter accepted from Grumman) but it was twin brother to the FG-1 (the first fighter accepted from Goodyear) and the AU-1 (the first attack plane accepted from Vought) which had no relationship to the A1D ( the first attack plane from Douglas.)
ProfessorF8
_VISITCOMMUNITY
New Jersey, United States
Joined: September 01, 2004
KitMaker: 86 posts
AeroScale: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 07:42 AM UTC

Quoted Text

F=fighter or interceptor role. In the early 60's, the Air Force and Navy combined their two systems of nomenclature to a single one.



Indeed, before McNamara "Edselized" the whole system, the F-4 Phantom II was known by the Navy as the F4H1, and later by the Air Force as the F-110 "Spectre."
CRS
_VISITCOMMUNITY
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 07:49 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Indeed, before McNamara "Edselized" the whole system, the F-4 Phantom II was known by the Navy as the F4H1, and later by the Air Force as the F-110 "Spectre."



Why yes it was, I have a photo taken (of the real thing) on the Rollout date for the Air Force at Lambert field, St. Louis, MO

JPTRR
Staff MemberManaging Editor
RAILROAD MODELING
#051
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Tennessee, United States
Joined: December 21, 2002
KitMaker: 7,772 posts
AeroScale: 3,175 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 - 02:17 PM UTC

Quoted Text

One version of the P-38 was reassigned as an F-15 ...



The recon P-38 was the F-5.
 _GOTOTOP