New forums breakdown seems OK, except why did we use 1925 as the breakpoint, vice 1935 which it was previously ??? The 1925-35 stuff, more akin to WW1/Golden Age than WW2, will just get lost in the WW2 forum ... The 20's stuff bears very little direct relevance to WW2 ...
Is there a technical reason we cannot transfer the threads tagged by topic to the new forums just to keep them going ... or is it technically possible, but humanly too much work ?? Just wondering ...
Thanks,
John
Site Feedback
Have a suggestion or topic about this site? Post it here.
Have a suggestion or topic about this site? Post it here.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
Why 1925 (vice 1935) for Early & WW2 break
jRatz
North Carolina, United States
Joined: March 06, 2004
KitMaker: 1,171 posts
AeroScale: 151 posts
Joined: March 06, 2004
KitMaker: 1,171 posts
AeroScale: 151 posts
Posted: Friday, October 06, 2006 - 07:04 AM UTC
Lucky13
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: June 01, 2006
KitMaker: 1,707 posts
AeroScale: 1,119 posts
Joined: June 01, 2006
KitMaker: 1,707 posts
AeroScale: 1,119 posts
Posted: Friday, October 06, 2006 - 08:19 AM UTC
John.....
Would you rather see it split as WWI, Between The Wars (Golden Age) and WWII?
Would you rather see it split as WWI, Between The Wars (Golden Age) and WWII?
JackFlash
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Friday, October 06, 2006 - 10:46 AM UTC
I am just guessing but there were significant advances concerning the use of all metal aircraft and aloys that became more apparent after the Spirit of St. Louis crossed the Atlantic. But I have no problem with the suggestion of keeping them together. Its up to the admin.
Posted: Friday, October 06, 2006 - 04:52 PM UTC
Hi John
The simple answer is that it's just for convenience! There's no perfect way to divide things up by date - and my first effort at organising over a century of aviation would have translated into such a complicated Forum with so many categories that we'd spend more time figuring where to post than actually posting! :-)
Golden Age subjects and the Post-War period proved particularly tough to categorise so, after consulting with Jim, the C20th is simply divided into quarters and open ended to allow earlier and present-day stuff. There are still sub-categories to add for a wider range of nationalities than in the old forum.
All the best
Rowan
The simple answer is that it's just for convenience! There's no perfect way to divide things up by date - and my first effort at organising over a century of aviation would have translated into such a complicated Forum with so many categories that we'd spend more time figuring where to post than actually posting! :-)
Golden Age subjects and the Post-War period proved particularly tough to categorise so, after consulting with Jim, the C20th is simply divided into quarters and open ended to allow earlier and present-day stuff. There are still sub-categories to add for a wider range of nationalities than in the old forum.
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Friday, October 06, 2006 - 11:52 PM UTC
I don't really have a preference. 1935 originally sounded like a good starting point for WWII aircraft to me (way back when) simply because there had been a lot of innovation from that point forward. Of course one could argue that innovation had started as soon as planes departed from using canvas...
As for the 25 year breakup periods, Rowan you had actually had 1970 as the start of the Modern period, but I thought that would be odd as it would be leaving out the last few years of the Vietnam conflict which obviously was a big part of the Cold War.
It's all subjective anyways. :-)
Cheers,
Jim
As for the 25 year breakup periods, Rowan you had actually had 1970 as the start of the Modern period, but I thought that would be odd as it would be leaving out the last few years of the Vietnam conflict which obviously was a big part of the Cold War.
It's all subjective anyways. :-)
Cheers,
Jim
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 12:34 AM UTC
Quoted Text
As for the 25 year breakup periods, Rowan you had actually had 1970 as the start of the Modern period...
Hi Jim
:-) I was obviously just checking you were paying attention with that one!
Looking back at the previous MindManager file, the eras were set as:
Early Aviation - Up to 1935
WW2 - 1935 -1950
Cold War - 1950 - 1970(5!)
Present day - 1975 onwards
The first thought often turns out to be the best one, so if that makes more sense for everyone, let's go back to it.
All the best
Rowan
jRatz
North Carolina, United States
Joined: March 06, 2004
KitMaker: 1,171 posts
AeroScale: 151 posts
Joined: March 06, 2004
KitMaker: 1,171 posts
AeroScale: 151 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 05:40 AM UTC
1935 is great !!!
Thanks,
John
Thanks,
John
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 10:15 AM UTC
Hi all!
I would also say 1935 is better...
Jean-Luc
I would also say 1935 is better...
Jean-Luc
Lucky13
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: June 01, 2006
KitMaker: 1,707 posts
AeroScale: 1,119 posts
Joined: June 01, 2006
KitMaker: 1,707 posts
AeroScale: 1,119 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 12:56 PM UTC
I think that I'll vote for 1935 too.
As in....
Early Aviation - Up to 1935
WW2 - 1935 -1950
Cold War - 1950 - 1975
Present day - 1975 onwards
As in....
Early Aviation - Up to 1935
WW2 - 1935 -1950
Cold War - 1950 - 1975
Present day - 1975 onwards
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 01:20 PM UTC
Hi all
Jim phoned me last night and, surprise, surprise, the new Forum structure was top of our agenda! As you can see - 1935 it is!
You'll notice more changes in the future - the Sub-Categories are the obvious one; we'll be covering a wider variety of nationalities than previously (so Russia and France will finally get a look in, for instance!) - but Jim also plans changes to the way the menus for Reviews and Features work.
Time and commitments across the whole Network are issues for Jim, but it's exciting to be in at the birth of a great new aviation modelling site!
All the best
Rowan
Jim phoned me last night and, surprise, surprise, the new Forum structure was top of our agenda! As you can see - 1935 it is!
You'll notice more changes in the future - the Sub-Categories are the obvious one; we'll be covering a wider variety of nationalities than previously (so Russia and France will finally get a look in, for instance!) - but Jim also plans changes to the way the menus for Reviews and Features work.
Time and commitments across the whole Network are issues for Jim, but it's exciting to be in at the birth of a great new aviation modelling site!
All the best
Rowan
Lucky13
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: June 01, 2006
KitMaker: 1,707 posts
AeroScale: 1,119 posts
Joined: June 01, 2006
KitMaker: 1,707 posts
AeroScale: 1,119 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 03:11 PM UTC
Grumpyoldman
_ADVISOR
Florida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
AeroScale: 836 posts
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
AeroScale: 836 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 03:33 PM UTC
1935 works fine for me. :-)
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 03:47 PM UTC
Quoted Text
1935 works fine for me. :-)
I've been thinking... is 1935 OK? :-) :-)
I reckon we'll have to start the 1935 Club at this rate - I don't know what it can stand for, but it's a cool name!
All the best
Rowan
Lucky13
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: June 01, 2006
KitMaker: 1,707 posts
AeroScale: 1,119 posts
Joined: June 01, 2006
KitMaker: 1,707 posts
AeroScale: 1,119 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 04:39 PM UTC
1935 Club or Club 35.....lol! Well, back then we had beautiful cars, motorcycles, aeroplanes, women........