In-Box Review
Austro-Hung. Albatros Aces WWI
Osprey Aircraft of the Aces 110
  • move

by: Stephen T. Lawson [ JACKFLASH ]

"Austro-Hungarian industry produced a series of less than stellar fighter types. The Phönix D.I and Hansa-Brandenburg D.I came during the early stages of the war. It was not until license-built versions of the German Albatros and D.II and D.III began to reach Fliegerkompagnien, or Fliks, in May 1917 that the fortunes of pilots began to look up. Unlike the German-built Albatros, the Oeffag aircraft were far more robust than German D.II and D.III. They also displayed superior speed, climb, manoeuvrability and infinitely safer flight characteristics. The careful cross-checking of Allied sources with Austrian and German records form the basis for a detailed reconstruction of the dogfights fought by the leading aces. It will also chart the careers of the Austro-Hungarian aces that flew the D.II and D.III, their successes and their defeats, with additional information about their personal background and their post-war lives in the nations born from the collapse of the Hapsburg Empire."

Aircraft of the Aces 110
Author: Paolo Varriale
Illustrator: Harry Dempsey
Paperback; December 2012; 96 pages;
A long awaited fighter
Russian, Romanian and Albanian Fronts
The Italian Front
Appendices: Ace Listing; Plates Commentary

The process of writing a book seems straightforward enough. Unfortunately in this case the editing process tends to damage this manuscript more than help. The consistent errors I see in this book results from editors that have no understanding of the parlance in describing the subject matter. Multiple aircraft is not to be described as Albatros D.IIIs. Adding the suffix “s” to aircraft nomenclatures is inappropriate. To be correct adding words like “types” or “airframes” is correct. Often the single designation such as “Albatros D.II” implies the type and can be left to stand alone.

There is no designation such as "Albatros D.IIs" but the editor of this book has tried to make it so. Trying to note multiples with the suffix “s” can lead neophytes to believe that there is a subtype of Camel or other aircraft with the “s” designation. Also adding the suffix -’s to write “SE 5a’s” denotes a possessive not a plural. The most popular form of editing is the “Chicago Tribune form”. This is taught in colleges & universities everywhere these days. The form tends to encourage these misnomers when it comes to types designations. While there are some other minor typographical errors the reader should have little trouble gleaning good information from this reference.

When contacting manufacturers and publishers please mention you saw this review at AEROSCALE
Highs: Excellent biography and aircraft type commentaries. As usual for this series color profiles are very well done.
Lows: Improper editing has caused a problem. Some plan view drawings would improve this book's value.
Verdict: Solid information. Some photo images not previously published. Well worth having.
Percentage Rating
  Scale: N/A
  Mfg. ID: ISBN: 9781849087476
  Suggested Retail: $22.95
  Related Link: Website
  PUBLISHED: Jun 07, 2013

About Stephen T. Lawson (JackFlash)

I was building Off topic jet age kits at the age of 7. I remember building my first WWI kit way back in 1964-5 at the age of 8-9. Hundreds of 1/72 scale Revell and Airfix kits later my eyes started to change and I wanted to do more detail. With the advent of DML / Dragon and Eduard I sold off my ...

Copyright ©2021 text by Stephen T. Lawson [ JACKFLASH ]. Images also by copyright holder unless otherwise noted. Opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AeroScale. All rights reserved.


Click image to enlarge
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move