1⁄35First Jets
11
Comments
The Kits
When you open the two boxes, you first notice there are few sprues. Two for the Pioneer kit and only one for the He 178! But with the Condor kit, you are rewarded with a small photo etched fret for some detail parts (picture 1). There is also one PE fret in the Special hobby kit (picture 2), but there are only two parts for the front landing gear on it? I think it's the smallest PE fret I ever saw. The total parts (including the injected canopy for both kits and PE) are of 44 for the Heinkel and 41 for the Gloster. Far away from the 100+ you find in average WW2 kits.Between the two kits you can see that short-run manufactures are improving in the quality of their mouldings. The Condor kit, though acceptable, is made of hard pale grey plastic with the usual flash. The panel lines are nicely done but, in my opinion, not deep enough. Overall, the kit is a good example of what was the standard ten years ago, and you will need to sand the surface a little bit to get rid of the small imperfections! The Special Hobby offering is more crisply done and the grey plastic is softer (almost vinyl like!) with very good surface detail. If there weren't some flash and no locator pins, I would say it is almost Tamigawa quality. In the He 178 kit you also have an instrument panel printed on a plastic film and the "goodie" of the E.28/39 is a nice little decal sheet.
The instructions of the Condor kit are quite basic: some history of the plane, two step assembly drawings, two view painting guide and a parts reference guide. About the later, I noticed the layout of the parts was different than the one I found on the kit sprue! I guess it's because the instructions were originally made for the 1/72 kit! They even used the same box; that’s why there is a 1/48 sticker on the front cover! The instructions of the Special Hobby kit are more detailed: you have some history as well, a four step detailed assembly guide and two four view painting instruction guides. The parts reference guide is also there and this time it matches the real sprue layout of the kit.
Overall, I would say the Special Hobby kit looks better in the box, and therefore the Pioneer takes the lead.
Comments
Jean-Luc no need to make it shorter next time, with that kind of information and work to be displayed it's the length it needs to be long or short. Good job, keep up the good work.
AUG 15, 2005 - 09:21 AM
Hi
what a great feature.
Excellent work Jean-Luc.
I thoroughly enjoyed reading it from first to last.
Thanks and cheers
Peter
:-)
AUG 15, 2005 - 05:54 PM
Bonjour Jean-Luc,
Excellent review of these early jets! don't worry about the lenght of your text, only your subject that counts!
Félicitations !
Francois
AUG 15, 2005 - 08:08 PM
Jean-Luc,
Yes sorry it took so long to get it published, the learning curve came down a little. The length is fine don't worry about that (just replace ! with . and all will great ) I enjoyed reading it and, More importantly I will probably buy these 2 models on the basis of your review/build, thanks.
Mal
AUG 16, 2005 - 06:59 AM
Hi all!
Thanks to all for your nice comments! I really do appreciate them as they are good motivation to do some more!
Peter, I have a project on the go that will probably interest you! Stay tuned!
Chuck and François... vous l'aurez voulu! I can even make longer........ ZZzz! ZZzz! Zzzzz!
Mal!!! What about my !!!s, I wondered if it was a Mac/PC compatibility problem!!! I like my !!!s! Doh! What!? It's to much!!! Ok I'll make an effort next time! Maybe I'm too enthusiastic!!! :-)
Jean-Luc
AUG 16, 2005 - 07:39 AM
I'm not! You should see the lousy car I'm driving! :-)
I said I can make longer... not I will make longer.
Jean-Luc
AUG 16, 2005 - 07:56 AM
Oh oh...
are we getting in to a "size matters" issue here...tut tut... :-)
Jean-Luc...you just make them as long as you want... :-)
Cheers
Peter
:-)
AUG 16, 2005 - 06:37 PM
Excellent article Jean-Luc!
Sorry - I've only just had a chance to read it!
Just for the record - re- the missing prototype "P" on the Pioneer; according to the only known photo, the prototype marking doesn't seem to have been applied at the time of the first flight.
For anyone interested in the story of the E.28 (and early jet developments), Tim Kershaw's "Jet Pioneers" is a must read, with plenty of previously unpublished photos and drawings.
All the best
Rowan
AUG 18, 2005 - 09:12 AM
Copyright ©2021 by Jean-Luc Formery. Images also by copyright holder unless otherwise noted. The views and opinions expressed herein are solely the views and opinions of the authors and/or contributors to this Web site and do not necessarily represent the views and/or opinions of AeroScale, KitMaker Network, or Silver Star Enterrpises. Images also by copyright holder unless otherwise noted. Opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AeroScale. All rights reserved. Originally published on: 2005-08-15 00:00:00. Unique Reads: 12687