Quoted Text
hello Vance,
i am wondering if we should included Japan in the campaign.it was the staging area for most of the Bombers and Transports.
Including Japan to what extent?
For example, Japanese units did not participate directly (I have no idea if they played support roles though), but US aircraft did take off from Japan to accomplish missions over Korea. The latter should certainly be included, but the former shouldn't be.
I think a Japanese navy tender that might have serviced a US combat ship is one degree too far removed.
Now what about US units that did not actually fight in Korea but supported units that did... good question. But really ANG units that never left the states did the same thing by covering US mainland security interests while the AF units were in Korea. Do you want to include state-side units?
Similarly, state-side military medical people were just as involved dealing with the wounded as those in Tokyo.
Then what about the elements Russia and China that supported the North Koreans?
Personally, I'd be inclined to limit it to units that actually saw action on the peninsula or the waters immediately surrounding it. Otherwise, pretty much anything from the early 1950s becomes fair game.