Early Aviation
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
wood finish
doppelganger
Idaho, United States
Joined: March 09, 2010
KitMaker: 557 posts
AeroScale: 193 posts
Joined: March 09, 2010
KitMaker: 557 posts
AeroScale: 193 posts
Posted: Monday, September 20, 2010 - 04:05 AM UTC
was it typical for the prop and wing struts to have the same type of wood and finish? I am trying to replicate this prop finish however it does have a VERY old patina
Kornbeef
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: November 06, 2005
KitMaker: 1,667 posts
AeroScale: 1,551 posts
Joined: November 06, 2005
KitMaker: 1,667 posts
AeroScale: 1,551 posts
Posted: Monday, September 20, 2010 - 07:16 AM UTC
No I think not...props were made of different wood to structural parts I believe. Sometimes mahogony and other hard woods due to the forces put on them. A lot of structural was lighter woods like spruce those strengths differed.
Talking out my hat though, I'm no expert.
Keith
Talking out my hat though, I'm no expert.
Keith
JackFlash
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Monday, September 20, 2010 - 07:33 AM UTC
Keith is right. Yet the Copal varnish often tended to make the wood look similar.
doppelganger
Idaho, United States
Joined: March 09, 2010
KitMaker: 557 posts
AeroScale: 193 posts
Joined: March 09, 2010
KitMaker: 557 posts
AeroScale: 193 posts
Posted: Monday, September 20, 2010 - 08:20 AM UTC
thanks to you both,thats a relief since I would have trouble duplicating the finish since I did not note how I painted them.I have a variety of oil paints I am going to experiment with on the two props I have on hand.Copal resin varnish?interesting.
wombat58
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: March 26, 2009
KitMaker: 366 posts
AeroScale: 309 posts
Joined: March 26, 2009
KitMaker: 366 posts
AeroScale: 309 posts
Posted: Monday, September 20, 2010 - 03:11 PM UTC
Mahogany was widely used because it is light, stable and works easily, has uniform grain pattern and is reasonably strong.
Walnut is similar, perhaps stronger than Mahogany.
Oak was extensively used from 1915 onwards.
Have a look here;
http://www.woodenpropeller.com
Des.
http://www.ww1aircraftmodels.com
Walnut is similar, perhaps stronger than Mahogany.
Oak was extensively used from 1915 onwards.
Have a look here;
http://www.woodenpropeller.com
Des.
http://www.ww1aircraftmodels.com
doppelganger
Idaho, United States
Joined: March 09, 2010
KitMaker: 557 posts
AeroScale: 193 posts
Joined: March 09, 2010
KitMaker: 557 posts
AeroScale: 193 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 - 05:37 PM UTC
thanks for the reference to aircraftmodels.com lots of new info for me
doppelganger
Idaho, United States
Joined: March 09, 2010
KitMaker: 557 posts
AeroScale: 193 posts
Joined: March 09, 2010
KitMaker: 557 posts
AeroScale: 193 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 23, 2010 - 03:55 PM UTC
the prop was laminated construction..right? does not look like it here because of stain finish, I guess.
JackFlash
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 23, 2010 - 04:46 PM UTC