Hai,
I never built a WW I airplane but it is time, after so many modern speed monsters, to go back to the early days of aviation when a piece of tissue, some wood and a basic engine was sufficient.
My question to all WO I specialists is; with what model and brand should I start (only 1/48 scale considered).
The models should not have too many of those pesky strings (those scare me) but a highly detailed engine, some visible wood work on the outside, a good view on the primitive cockpits of those days would be highly appreciated.
Fire away, I wonder whether you will reach a consensus
Early Aviation
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
best option to build?
drabslab
European Union
Joined: September 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,186 posts
AeroScale: 1,587 posts
Joined: September 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,186 posts
AeroScale: 1,587 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 01:42 AM UTC
MichaelSatin
Campaigns Administrator
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 19, 2008
KitMaker: 3,909 posts
AeroScale: 2,904 posts
Joined: January 19, 2008
KitMaker: 3,909 posts
AeroScale: 2,904 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 01:59 AM UTC
Eduard Fokker D.VII. Minimal rigging, iconic aircraft, excellent kit. My opinion, anyway.
Michael
Michael
GhostHawk
Cordoba, Argentina
Joined: January 27, 2011
KitMaker: 268 posts
AeroScale: 264 posts
Joined: January 27, 2011
KitMaker: 268 posts
AeroScale: 264 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 05:10 AM UTC
Hi:
The Albatros family, from Eduard, is very nice too...
Diego
The Albatros family, from Eduard, is very nice too...
Diego
StukaJr
California, United States
Joined: April 26, 2010
KitMaker: 346 posts
AeroScale: 292 posts
Joined: April 26, 2010
KitMaker: 346 posts
AeroScale: 292 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 06:08 AM UTC
It's a little bit difficult to give advice on this - after exclusively building Early Aviation subjects for over 2 years now, any plane with rigging gives no pause (occasional head scratch when dabbling into double lines, tail booms and external control wires)
Eduard Nieuport family is fun to build, though most of its wood is painted silver on the exterior (you still get struts / propeller). Rigging is on the low intensity, though still high intensity for the beginner.
If you want varnished wood - Albatros is your must. Eduard kits are nice, but make sure to get aftermarket landing gear legs as stock ones are noticeably stubby. Engine is on the simple side, though Mercedes D.III is very iconic. Rigging is not too much - my starter into the WWI fray were Albatros D.II, D.V, D.III and a few more repeats until I realized there were non-Albatros planes.
Eduard Roland Cl.II is very minimal rigging and beautiful all wood bird - overpainted on the outside, varnished wood interior. Just don't do Eduard suggested mauve camo and you are good.
Eduard Nieuport family is fun to build, though most of its wood is painted silver on the exterior (you still get struts / propeller). Rigging is on the low intensity, though still high intensity for the beginner.
If you want varnished wood - Albatros is your must. Eduard kits are nice, but make sure to get aftermarket landing gear legs as stock ones are noticeably stubby. Engine is on the simple side, though Mercedes D.III is very iconic. Rigging is not too much - my starter into the WWI fray were Albatros D.II, D.V, D.III and a few more repeats until I realized there were non-Albatros planes.
Eduard Roland Cl.II is very minimal rigging and beautiful all wood bird - overpainted on the outside, varnished wood interior. Just don't do Eduard suggested mauve camo and you are good.
dolly15
Quebec, Canada
Joined: May 20, 2004
KitMaker: 8,227 posts
AeroScale: 3,915 posts
Joined: May 20, 2004
KitMaker: 8,227 posts
AeroScale: 3,915 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 06:22 AM UTC
No rigging = Fokker triplane.
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 10:05 AM UTC
There is good advice above, the Eduard Fokker DVII has no rigging, fair cockpit and engine and fits together well. The Nieuports 11 or 16 have more rigging but not excessive again the Eduard kits are nice. I haven't built the Eduard Fokker Tripe but it is another with no rigging, the Revell 1/28 one has just been re-issued and isn't too bad. Albatros DIII and DV from Eduard I can recommend, the rigging is similar to the Nieuport and they look great completed. Don't try a Camel, SE5, Spad, Bristol Fighter or Pfaltz, you need practice first. I would go for a Nieuport or Alby first, rigging is there but manageable. Finally, there are other biplanes, Fiat CR32 and CR42 from Italeri are nice and have little rigging. I like WW1 Eduard kits, nice balance between price and detail, with superdetail kits available
Bink123
Quebec, Canada
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 414 posts
AeroScale: 364 posts
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 414 posts
AeroScale: 364 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 11:42 AM UTC
I'd go with an Eduard Fokker D.VII, or a Nieuport 11 or 17, because the fokker has interplanetary struts of an 'N' shape, so the top wing is easier to mount than with individual struts, the Nieuports outboard struts are 'V' shaped. The Albatros fighters are a good bet for the same reason.
The eduard kits build up easily. I think that The eduard weekend kits are good value, although the Fokker D.VII is only available as the Hugarian version, which is still a cool looking aircraft, the radiator and the machine guns are different than the German D.VII. As well, the Hungarians turned the Albatross fighters into real hot rods with different engines., check them out.
The eduard kits build up easily. I think that The eduard weekend kits are good value, although the Fokker D.VII is only available as the Hugarian version, which is still a cool looking aircraft, the radiator and the machine guns are different than the German D.VII. As well, the Hungarians turned the Albatross fighters into real hot rods with different engines., check them out.
Bink123
Quebec, Canada
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 414 posts
AeroScale: 364 posts
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 414 posts
AeroScale: 364 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 01:27 PM UTC
Interplanetary Struts? Interplane struts. darn auto-correct.
StukaJr
California, United States
Joined: April 26, 2010
KitMaker: 346 posts
AeroScale: 292 posts
Joined: April 26, 2010
KitMaker: 346 posts
AeroScale: 292 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 - 02:22 PM UTC
remember "some visible wood work on the outside" as the loose "requirement"
Dr.I or D.VII need not apply
Dr.I or D.VII need not apply
Posted: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 - 08:39 AM UTC
Albatros wins then, wood monocoque fuselage and moderate rigging, Eduard is nice and Revell do a 1/48 one as well, don't know how good it is though. The Roland might be ok, never built it and don't know if a natural wood finish was used on it's wood monocoque
Bink123
Quebec, Canada
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 414 posts
AeroScale: 364 posts
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 414 posts
AeroScale: 364 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 - 11:00 AM UTC
I think the Revell 1/48 Albatros IS the Eduard Albatros repackaged with different decals.
as for the monocoque fuselage, I built a D.Va, and I asked off each wood panel and painted them separately. A little bit of mostly yellow and red clear afterwards gives the 'wood' a nice Woody hue. There is a lot of information on the net about recreating wood look.
I also used EZ Line for the rigging (stretchy thread)
Good luck.
PS I think even the early Roland C.II's were painted light sky blue, afterwards camo, but the exact colours are a subject of debate.
as for the monocoque fuselage, I built a D.Va, and I asked off each wood panel and painted them separately. A little bit of mostly yellow and red clear afterwards gives the 'wood' a nice Woody hue. There is a lot of information on the net about recreating wood look.
I also used EZ Line for the rigging (stretchy thread)
Good luck.
PS I think even the early Roland C.II's were painted light sky blue, afterwards camo, but the exact colours are a subject of debate.
drabslab
European Union
Joined: September 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,186 posts
AeroScale: 1,587 posts
Joined: September 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,186 posts
AeroScale: 1,587 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 02:55 AM UTC
Thanks a lot for all the input.
Whatever I finally build, it will be a tribute to an exciting Aeroscale community
Whatever I finally build, it will be a tribute to an exciting Aeroscale community