That's a beauty Eetu and I'm happy to see you back and building again!
May I ask for a side-by-side photo with your "old" Blenheim when this one is finished?
Magnus
World War II
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Discuss WWII and the era directly before and after the war from 1935-1949.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
1:72 Blenheim mk.I - new Airfix kit
magnusf
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 1,953 posts
AeroScale: 1,902 posts
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 1,953 posts
AeroScale: 1,902 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 12, 2015 - 02:14 PM UTC
Emeritus
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
AeroScale: 1,564 posts
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
AeroScale: 1,564 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2015 - 03:31 AM UTC
Thanks! Actually it's already finished. I got it done during the break week, I just hadn't gotten the pictures posted here yet. Sorry for the delay, it's been rather hectic lately.
Oh yeah, sure, I can take a few side-by-side pictures with the MPM Blenheim. I'll take those when I get to unpacking my built models - I spent last 6 weeks or so in a temporary apartment due to renovations.
Anyway, here's some pics of the finished model.
The models depicts BL-136, one of the ex-RAF Blenheims purchased for the Finnish Air Force, how it appeared in the summer of 1940: original RAF camoflage scheme, no yellow eastern front markings yet, with then-standard big (conforming to the 4/5 insignia size regulation) wing insignias. The right side ailerons and inner wing bomb bay doors were replaced with parts from another aircraft, so they were painted accordingly.
Oh yeah, sure, I can take a few side-by-side pictures with the MPM Blenheim. I'll take those when I get to unpacking my built models - I spent last 6 weeks or so in a temporary apartment due to renovations.
Anyway, here's some pics of the finished model.
The models depicts BL-136, one of the ex-RAF Blenheims purchased for the Finnish Air Force, how it appeared in the summer of 1940: original RAF camoflage scheme, no yellow eastern front markings yet, with then-standard big (conforming to the 4/5 insignia size regulation) wing insignias. The right side ailerons and inner wing bomb bay doors were replaced with parts from another aircraft, so they were painted accordingly.
Joel_W
Associate Editor
New York, United States
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
AeroScale: 7,410 posts
Posted: Monday, March 16, 2015 - 07:39 PM UTC
Eetu,
An absolutely stunning build. Outstanding camo paint scheme, perfect decaling, and just the right amount of weathering, all add up to a fantastic looking build. Nice touch with the "replacement" parts as they add just that little extra to your build.
Joel
An absolutely stunning build. Outstanding camo paint scheme, perfect decaling, and just the right amount of weathering, all add up to a fantastic looking build. Nice touch with the "replacement" parts as they add just that little extra to your build.
Joel
Emeritus
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
AeroScale: 1,564 posts
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
AeroScale: 1,564 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 19, 2015 - 12:38 AM UTC
Thanks, nice to hear you like it!
Posted: Saturday, April 04, 2015 - 12:48 AM UTC
Hi: Just like to add my admiration for your lovely Blenheim build. Really beautiful.
I was interested in your feelings about the upper nacelle bulging as it does, when I came upon this image in Facebook, of a recently restored Blenheim. I have the first incarnation of the new Airfix kit but haven't had time to study it with the nacelle in the same position as the photo. What do you think?
Best regards
Steve
I was interested in your feelings about the upper nacelle bulging as it does, when I came upon this image in Facebook, of a recently restored Blenheim. I have the first incarnation of the new Airfix kit but haven't had time to study it with the nacelle in the same position as the photo. What do you think?
Best regards
Steve
magnusf
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 1,953 posts
AeroScale: 1,902 posts
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 1,953 posts
AeroScale: 1,902 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 04, 2015 - 01:31 AM UTC
I realise that I haven't commented on your build yet: I'm sorry, it really deserves it! A stunning Blenheim that I really would like to see in real life! A real inspiration.
Magnus
Magnus
Posted: Saturday, April 04, 2015 - 04:48 PM UTC
Fantastic build, Eetu!!!
This has definitely brought me around to the charms of the Blenheim! I'll be keeping an eye out for this kit at my LHS!
Russ
This has definitely brought me around to the charms of the Blenheim! I'll be keeping an eye out for this kit at my LHS!
Russ
Emeritus
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
AeroScale: 1,564 posts
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
AeroScale: 1,564 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 04, 2015 - 07:28 PM UTC
Thanks for the compliments! Glad you like it.
Oh, it's absolutely a kit worth picking up! A massive improvement over the MPM kit I build some years ago. The only areas in which I feel it's better than the new Airfix kit is the inclusion of PE and resin parts, and way the cockpit/front fuselage halves are made as clear parts as opposed to the combination of grey styrene sidewalls and clear window parts.
I definitely gotta build the new Do-17Z next, I've heard it's even better than the Blenheims!
Simple, it's not a 100% Blenheim, but a hybrid largely based on a Canadian-built Bristol Bolingbroke variant.
I feel I must presume the designers of the kit made the mistake of looking too much and too closely to Bolingbroke-based restorations and not enough to blueprints and photos of actual Blenheims.
Blenheims in flight:
Here's some mk.Is, a BIG photo, hence a text link: http://miliblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/bristol-blenheim-mk1-bombers.jpg
Probably due to Blenheim being a much more iconic and recognizable moniker than Bolingbroke (and the majority of people likely not to even care about to such details), it seems to be mainly touted as a Blenheim. Even the Aircraft Restoration Company page about it only mentions it being recovered in Canada. Other sites like Warbirdnews.com go further into the details.
The larger upper nacelles on the Bolingbroke are the result of the requirement to improve the plane's operational range. As the fuel capacity was increased, the oil tanks located in the upper nacelles needed to be enlarged respectively, hence the bigger nacelles. A dinghy housing was built into the right side upper nacelles, adding a quite visible bump there.
To my knowledge, the closest thing to a restored "true" Bristol Blenheim so far is the Blenheim mk.IV (BL-200), originally license-built in Finland during WW2, in the Aviation Museum of Central Finland. (here's a Wikimedia gallery of it: -link-)
Quoted Text
Fantastic build, Eetu!!!
This has definitely brought me around to the charms of the Blenheim! I'll be keeping an eye out for this kit at my LHS!
Russ
Oh, it's absolutely a kit worth picking up! A massive improvement over the MPM kit I build some years ago. The only areas in which I feel it's better than the new Airfix kit is the inclusion of PE and resin parts, and way the cockpit/front fuselage halves are made as clear parts as opposed to the combination of grey styrene sidewalls and clear window parts.
I definitely gotta build the new Do-17Z next, I've heard it's even better than the Blenheims!
Quoted Text
Hi: Just like to add my admiration for your lovely Blenheim build. Really beautiful.
I was interested in your feelings about the upper nacelle bulging as it does, when I came upon this image in Facebook, of a recently restored Blenheim. I have the first incarnation of the new Airfix kit but haven't had time to study it with the nacelle in the same position as the photo. What do you think?
Best regards
Steve
Simple, it's not a 100% Blenheim, but a hybrid largely based on a Canadian-built Bristol Bolingbroke variant.
I feel I must presume the designers of the kit made the mistake of looking too much and too closely to Bolingbroke-based restorations and not enough to blueprints and photos of actual Blenheims.
Blenheims in flight:
Here's some mk.Is, a BIG photo, hence a text link: http://miliblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/bristol-blenheim-mk1-bombers.jpg
Probably due to Blenheim being a much more iconic and recognizable moniker than Bolingbroke (and the majority of people likely not to even care about to such details), it seems to be mainly touted as a Blenheim. Even the Aircraft Restoration Company page about it only mentions it being recovered in Canada. Other sites like Warbirdnews.com go further into the details.
The larger upper nacelles on the Bolingbroke are the result of the requirement to improve the plane's operational range. As the fuel capacity was increased, the oil tanks located in the upper nacelles needed to be enlarged respectively, hence the bigger nacelles. A dinghy housing was built into the right side upper nacelles, adding a quite visible bump there.
To my knowledge, the closest thing to a restored "true" Bristol Blenheim so far is the Blenheim mk.IV (BL-200), originally license-built in Finland during WW2, in the Aviation Museum of Central Finland. (here's a Wikimedia gallery of it: -link-)
Naseby
Slovakia
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
AeroScale: 476 posts
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
AeroScale: 476 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 05, 2015 - 02:02 AM UTC
Congratulations Eatu on a superb job. I like Your Blenheim a lot.
Posted: Sunday, April 05, 2015 - 03:16 PM UTC
I'll think the Dornier will be purchased at the same time as the Blenheim Eetu
As long as I can smuggle it past 'her indoors'
Maybe even the dog fight double with the defiant
Can we hope to see a build log of the Dornier from you???
Russ.
As long as I can smuggle it past 'her indoors'
Maybe even the dog fight double with the defiant
Can we hope to see a build log of the Dornier from you???
Russ.