Ohio, United States
Joined: February 04, 2005
KitMaker: 370 posts
AeroScale: 60 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 02, 2005 - 08:03 AM UTC
In the end, it all goes to the landfill, even you.
Idaho, United States
Joined: May 16, 2003
KitMaker: 895 posts
AeroScale: 457 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 08, 2005 - 04:18 PM UTC
The one question that has always puzzled me is on aircraft that were natural metal finish. I have seen reference material contradicting itself. One saying the bottom of the plane was left in metal finish and another says it was neutral grey.
Personally I like camo better.
Brian
There is only two kinds of fires. Those that use less than 500 gallons of water too extinguish and those that use WAY MORE!
New York, United States
Joined: January 29, 2004
KitMaker: 3,836 posts
AeroScale: 1,036 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 08, 2005 - 04:42 PM UTC
Hey crockett nicely done, the cockpit looks great. You should entry it in the Aircraft Model of the Month.
It feels like bible camp…Only I’m not crying pretending I’m somewhere else.
Happy Modeling
Joe
Texas, United States
Joined: March 20, 2005
KitMaker: 358 posts
AeroScale: 43 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 08, 2005 - 05:14 PM UTC
Crocket
I like it man. Always liked the the Jug. You did a great job on it.
Jerry
War is the insanity of sane men !
We who are about to die salute you ... WHOA....nobody said anything about dieing......hey watch that spear...... Gladatorius Chickenus
( Hey boss...I've cut this piece twice ......and it's still to short. )
Holdfast
President![KitMaker Network Subscriber](../../images/global/km_subscriber_small.gif)
#056
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: September 30, 2002
KitMaker: 8,581 posts
AeroScale: 4,913 posts
Posted: Monday, May 09, 2005 - 06:24 AM UTC
Very nicely done
![](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/smilies/smile.gif)
do the markings come with the kit?
I agree with joe, you should enter it in the MOM.
Mal
MAL the MASK
BULLDOG # 6 (President)
BEWARE OF THE FEW
Sappers: First in, last out. (UBIQUE)
It's not the same, better, but not the same.
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
AeroScale: 246 posts
Posted: Monday, May 09, 2005 - 06:55 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The one question that has always puzzled me is on aircraft that were natural metal finish. I have seen reference material contradicting itself. One saying the bottom of the plane was left in metal finish and another says it was neutral grey.
Personally I like camo better.
To my knowledge, the standard color that was painted was neutral grey on the underside. The point of neutral gray is so the aircraft blends into the sky when looking at it from the ground. The bare metal would glint and a spotter on the ground would see it. While I am sure it happened, given each unit's different SOP, I haven't seen a bare metal bottom aircraft with an upper camo scheme.
Jeff
Sua Sponte - Ranger Challenge 2006
A person does not grow old and wise but for surviving the dumb "stuff" when they were young.
Life is tough. It's tougher still if you're stupid.
Ohio, United States
Joined: February 04, 2005
KitMaker: 370 posts
AeroScale: 60 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 - 09:38 AM UTC
Thanks to all......
As to the belly, well your guess is as good as mine. while researching this aircraft, I only had a few BW pics that really didn't tell us anything. Even Gabreski gave conflicting answers concerning his own jug in interviews after the war. There are some photos that definitely suggest NMF underneath, and just as many that say RAF gray. Perhaps we will never know.
The markings are a mixture of kit decals and computer generated to create Dottie number three.
Steve
In the end, it all goes to the landfill, even you.