Hi guys
Because Patrick (Blackwulf) and I are true democrats We will of course let you vote for what kind of ribbon you would like for the Tank Busting - Down Low campaign. Both Patrick and I have worked with several different versions. On purpose these are shown in small sizes as the ribbons will also be small on the profiles. The best are shown below:
Ribbon 1:
Ribbon 2:
Ribbon 3:
Ribbon 4:
Ribbon 5:
Ribbon 6:
Ribbon 7:
You vote by adding a post in this tread stating the number of the ribbon you like and writing any comments below. For example please simply write "Ribbon 1" first and then comments below as this makes it easier to count the votes.
Furthermore, we have decided to add oakleaves to the ribbon of participants that submit more than one entry. This is of course done no matter what ribbon that gets "elected". The oakleaves is not up for election - they have already been elected The oakleaves might be bigger on the final version.
Oakleaves for two or more entries shown on an example ribbon:
Air Campaigns
Want to start or join a group build? This is where to start.
Want to start or join a group build? This is where to start.
Hosted by Frederick Boucher, Michael Satin
Vote for ribbon for the Tank Busting campaign
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 05:20 PM UTC
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 05:59 PM UTC
Ribbon 6:
or maybe 7 the others are nice but not easy to spot what they mean. Maybe on 7 you could leave out the text and enlarge the gun sight .. just a thought
Hi Jesper
One question: is this campaign about tank busting or ground attack ? I am not sure if my Fw 190 F-1 would fit in the tank hunter role...
best wishes
Steffen
or maybe 7 the others are nice but not easy to spot what they mean. Maybe on 7 you could leave out the text and enlarge the gun sight .. just a thought
Hi Jesper
One question: is this campaign about tank busting or ground attack ? I am not sure if my Fw 190 F-1 would fit in the tank hunter role...
best wishes
Steffen
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 06:03 PM UTC
Ribbon 6
or
Ribbon 7 (with out the text)
One question though is how do you go about awarding different ribbons for those that build more than one kit?
or
Ribbon 7 (with out the text)
One question though is how do you go about awarding different ribbons for those that build more than one kit?
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 06:20 PM UTC
Quoted Text
One question though is how do you go about awarding different ribbons for those that build more than one kit?
I do not know the technicalities yet, but I know it has been done on the Armorama page, so it should not be a problem here either.
@Steffen: Your question is a little of topic, so I have answered it in the official Tank Busting tread.
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 06:36 PM UTC
Ribbon 6 for me please
Tigerbait
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 28, 2005
KitMaker: 347 posts
AeroScale: 179 posts
Joined: September 28, 2005
KitMaker: 347 posts
AeroScale: 179 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 07:08 PM UTC
Ribbon 6 or 7. I won't be TOO picky.
klimmer
Ontario, Canada
Joined: May 16, 2003
KitMaker: 250 posts
AeroScale: 207 posts
Joined: May 16, 2003
KitMaker: 250 posts
AeroScale: 207 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 07:19 PM UTC
My vote will go for
Ribbon # 7
The only suggestion I would make will be to enlarge the gun sight like Steffan suggested.
Ted
Ribbon # 7
The only suggestion I would make will be to enlarge the gun sight like Steffan suggested.
Ted
Emeritus
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
AeroScale: 1,564 posts
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
AeroScale: 1,564 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 07:22 PM UTC
Ribbon 6.
Simple,effective design. Reminds me of the Finnish WWII tank destroyer badge:
...And I was just thinking about suggesting a slight adjustment. Perhaps change the color so the oak leaves would stand out a little better?
Simple,effective design. Reminds me of the Finnish WWII tank destroyer badge:
Quoted Text
The oakleaves is not up for election - they have already been elected
...And I was just thinking about suggesting a slight adjustment. Perhaps change the color so the oak leaves would stand out a little better?
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 07:57 PM UTC
Hi Jesper
Ribbon #6
I agree with Eetu that the oakleaves could be clearer (white might work well).
All the best
Rowan
Ribbon #6
I agree with Eetu that the oakleaves could be clearer (white might work well).
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 09:33 PM UTC
I think 6 or 7
bf443
Vendor
Idaho, United States
Joined: May 16, 2003
KitMaker: 895 posts
AeroScale: 457 posts
Joined: May 16, 2003
KitMaker: 895 posts
AeroScale: 457 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 10:23 PM UTC
Hi everyone,
No doubt in my mind, number "Six" is it !
Brian
No doubt in my mind, number "Six" is it !
Brian
Phantom2
Östergötland, Sweden
Joined: April 18, 2006
KitMaker: 708 posts
AeroScale: 678 posts
Joined: April 18, 2006
KitMaker: 708 posts
AeroScale: 678 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 10:31 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Ribbon 6:
Number six for me please!
Simple and effective, says it all!
Cheers!
Stefan E
Posted: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 11:47 PM UTC
Ribbon Six for me please
Nige
Nige
Sluff
Oulu, Finland
Joined: August 10, 2005
KitMaker: 77 posts
AeroScale: 34 posts
Joined: August 10, 2005
KitMaker: 77 posts
AeroScale: 34 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 - 12:44 AM UTC
ribbon 6
Eetu mentioned the reasons...
Eetu mentioned the reasons...
Percheron
Washington, United States
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 432 posts
AeroScale: 360 posts
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 432 posts
AeroScale: 360 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 - 02:24 AM UTC
I like #5
Posted: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 - 03:39 AM UTC
Hi Jesper!
Five is nice because there is a French flag in it! :-)
But seriously I would go for n°6 as well...
Jean-Luc
Five is nice because there is a French flag in it! :-)
But seriously I would go for n°6 as well...
Jean-Luc
Posted: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 - 12:18 PM UTC
First results:
Ribbon 6: 12 votes
Ribbon 7: 1 vote and some "6 or 7" votes
Ribbon 5: 1 vote
I see a clear pattern here :-) :-) Anyway, we will let the voting run for some more days despite the quite clear pattern
Ribbon 6: 12 votes
Ribbon 7: 1 vote and some "6 or 7" votes
Ribbon 5: 1 vote
I see a clear pattern here :-) :-) Anyway, we will let the voting run for some more days despite the quite clear pattern
Posted: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 - 12:20 PM UTC
Yeah quite similar design.
Quoted Text
...And I was just thinking about suggesting a slight adjustment. Perhaps change the color so the oak leaves would stand out a little better?
I think we will both enlarge the oakleaves and use a more visible colour on the final design.
Blackwulf
Ohio, United States
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 215 posts
AeroScale: 120 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 215 posts
AeroScale: 120 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 03:55 AM UTC
I was wondering if we should tack this folder to the top so that all participants will get a chance to view it?? Just a suggestion......
Posted: Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 05:47 AM UTC
Ribbon 7, with larger oak leaves that perhaps extend beyond the red ends.
Percheron
Washington, United States
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 432 posts
AeroScale: 360 posts
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 432 posts
AeroScale: 360 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 08:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi Jesper!
Five is nice because there is a French flag in it! :-)
But seriously I would go for n°6 as well...
Jean-Luc
Ha!! :-)
I did not even see that!
Still, I think because my P-39 is so powerful, so devastating, and so technologically advanced that it borders on being of "other worldly" design, I think my vote should count for 100.
Just a thought....
-Derek
Grypho
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: May 27, 2005
KitMaker: 162 posts
AeroScale: 49 posts
Joined: May 27, 2005
KitMaker: 162 posts
AeroScale: 49 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 08:58 AM UTC
6 for me too
Posted: Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 01:19 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Still, I think because my P-39 is so powerful, so devastating, and so technologically advanced that it borders on being of "other worldly" design, I think my vote should count for 100.
Just a thought....
-Derek
No, only campaign leaders vote count for 1000 :-) :-) :-)
VonCuda
North Carolina, United States
Joined: November 28, 2005
KitMaker: 2,216 posts
AeroScale: 1,080 posts
Joined: November 28, 2005
KitMaker: 2,216 posts
AeroScale: 1,080 posts
Posted: Friday, February 23, 2007 - 08:00 AM UTC
I'll go with #5..........but only because I feel sorry for Percheron and his tiny little P-39. :-) :-)
Percheron
Washington, United States
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 432 posts
AeroScale: 360 posts
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 432 posts
AeroScale: 360 posts
Posted: Friday, February 23, 2007 - 10:50 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I'll go with #5..........but only because I feel sorry for Percheron and his tiny little P-39. :-) :-)
:-) :-) Awesome! I love it! Thank you.
I have been telling myself for a long, long time that looks and the ability to get the job done are more important than size. And that applies to my P-39 as well.
-Derek