132
Silver Wings Hawker Hart Review Build

  • move
Parts Cleanup
Since they are not numbered, I decided to start this build by cleaning up all the parts. Immediately, I noted that the resin used for this kit is “softer” than resin I was used to dealing with. This made it much easier to do the parts cleanup since the parts were not as brittle. I was able to use my sprue cutter to clip all or most of the pour stubs from all the parts, and what remained just required a small bit of sanding with a sanding stick to finish. Overall, I think cleaning up these parts was easier than doing so for an injected plastic kit!

Things to note:

■ The bottom of the pilot’s seat has an interesting pour plug with two holes in it (see photo 1). As nice as this looks, it is not part of the seat and should be removed. Also note that the bottom of the seat will be visible from underneath if you have the bomb aiming panel open.
■ The area between the pilots and gunners cockpit has a section that needs to be removed. See photo 2.
■ The lower wings each have what looks like it could be a light housing on the wingtips. This should also be removed as the wings should be smooth with only rib detail in this area.

Interior Subassemblies
I began construction with the interior subassemblies. The instructions show these are a number of steps, each focused on one part of the interior. I encountered no issues with getting these completed. Photos 3 and 4 show the completed cockpit subassemblies.

Things to note:

■ When installing the lower seat brackets to the pilot’s seat, use two rods to position them correctly. You will need to line up the rod that goes through the top seat brackets with the top of the cockpit side frame, and then line up the lower seat brackets with the rod that goes into the forward hole in the bracket on the cockpit side frame.
■ You will need to drill a hole into the bottom of the control column to hold the cross-frame rod. I chose not to attach this to the floorboard at this time, rather attaching it during the building of the cockpit frame.
■ When installing the camera into its frame be sure to attach it oriented as shown in the instructions, noting that the frame is longer on the front side.
■ Review page 4 of the instructions, and attach items to the side of the frames as indicated (See photo 4) I ended up gluing another piece of frame to the port side frame to hold the radio gear frame and give me something solid to attach it to, and would recommend adding this to the portside frame at this point (see photos in cockpit assembly sections below).
■ The PE provided is very soft, and bends very easily, even when you don’t necessarily want it to, so I advise that you do not cut the outer frame of the PE fret at all, as it will destroy the integrity of the fret making it easier to damage the parts, and only remove the needed parts with the tip of an Xacto blade.
■ The instructions do not provide much in the way of painting instructions; however, according to the Mushroom Models Publication’s “Hawker Hart Family”, it appears that the cockpit framing should be semi-gloss black or grey, with the pilot’s seat, floor boards in natural aluminum or grey, oil tank in grey, fuel tank in natural aluminum or grey. And instrument panel in grey with black instrument surrounds. Fuselage sides metal areas in grey or natural aluminum, with fabric covered areas in linen/tan or with red dope bleeding through. Padding color for the floor where the observer lays to use the bombsite color unknown, but likely black or leather colored.
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move

About the Author

About Doug Nelson (DougN1)
FROM: GEORGIA, UNITED STATES

I've been modeling on and off for over 40 years. My primary interests are WW1, Interwar and WW2 aircraft, although I do build an occasional WW2 armour kit. I used to build 1/32 kits back in the 80's, but switched to 1/48 in the early 90's when all the nice new kits started showing up. I've sinc...


Comments

Nicely done build and fine mold too!
AUG 13, 2011 - 04:29 AM
Nice to see some "Tweeners" being released. Nice too to see a two seater. Do they do a Fury or a Demon? Cheers, Hugh
AUG 16, 2011 - 01:16 AM
Hi everyone. Thanks to Rowan for inviting me to post this "build guide"/review here. I wanted to see if I could get some feedback on what your thoughts are on this type of review. Is it too long, too short, too detailed, not detailed enough etc. Is there any benefit to you, the reader, in seeing the build without paint, or would you prefer to see it painted? This is the first review of this type I have done, so please let me know how I can improve it - don't be shy - I am a big boy and can take harsh criticism if necessary! Thanks! Doug
AUG 17, 2011 - 09:03 AM
Hi again I always used to read Model Aircraft Preview, and found their "nothing to hide behind" style really useful in judging a kit - often more so than a finely finished model that often said more about the skills of the builder than the quality of the kit. We've seriously considered running reviews in this style on Aeroscale in the past, so I'd also be very interested in seeing readers' feedback on it and whether it's something you'd like to see us do regularly for standard releases. All the best Rowan
AUG 17, 2011 - 10:41 AM
Doug and Rowan, I found this review very informative and probably just a tad too long although for the subject in question it may be right. I think without seeing this done on another subject, never having seen the magazine in question, it is hard to judge. The one question I have is what do you do with the made up kit now as you can not get inside to paint the interior? Myself I would not want to do this type of review but yes I did find it helpful.
AUG 17, 2011 - 11:47 AM
Hi Luciano Probably the reason more people aren't prepared to do a review like this is that the kit truly is "sacrificed" for the sake of showing how well it fits together (or otherwise). It sort of goes against every modelling instinct - a really tough decision to make, especially with a limited edition resin kit like this one! All the best Rowan
AUG 17, 2011 - 11:59 AM
Building it with out painting and filling is helpful, and shows how the kit really is, and how much work is needed correcting seam lines and whatnot. I have done the same type of review myself with a HobbyBoss F-16D Fighting Falcon , and although I did enjoy building it this way, it's not something I would like to do on a regular basis, unless I had two of the same kits and one could be "sacrificed" (but how often is that going to happen ). Andy
AUG 18, 2011 - 02:56 AM
Nice review Andy! @ Luciano - this kit will likely never see paint, as it has served its purpose as a review kit. I actually think it looks pretty good as is, but I just need to figure out where to put it @ Hugh - Montex did a 1/32 Fury which was mastered by the owner of Silver Wings before he started his own company. Ali @ A2Zee Models is now is the vendor for this kit and sells it with upgraded metal struts and proper 43 squadron decals. No one does a Demon that I know of, so if you really want one, you'll need to convert the Hart to get one Regarding reviews, I personally find it easiest to do the non-paint (and non-rigged for biplanes) reviews as I can get it done much faster when I don't need to plan painting/filling/decaling etc into the mix. And as some of you mentioned, the benefit is the reader gets to see how the kit is without anything "hidden" by filler and paint. As I was given this kit to review, and I have my own copy in the stash, I thought this review would be a good way to get to learn about the kit, and provide a useful review at the same time. I think doing the review kit this way will help me do a better job building my own Hart kit I'm currently working on the same type of review for the Silver Wings Gloster Gladiator, and I'll submit it for posting once it is complete. Thanks for your comments (and for anyone else that wants to provide feedback!!) and to the emailed comments I received as well. Cheers, Doug
AUG 18, 2011 - 09:35 AM