148
Kitty Hawk MiG-25PD Feature Review

What’s in the Box

Fortunately Kitty Hawk has come to the rescue and done a very good job in doing so.  What you get in the box are nearly 400 parts molded in light gray polystyrene plastic, seven molded in clear plastic, eight photo-etched parts, metal supports for the main gear struts, a ball bearing for nose weight and a sheet of decals and a 24 page instruction booklet (eight pages of which are the fold-out color profiles for the color and markings instructions). 

I was struck by the compactness of the box given the number of parts and the large size of the subject (once you take it out of the box, it is a bit of a puzzle getting it back in).  Parts are molded on 11 unique sprues, with two of the sprues being duplicated for weapons parts, and the two rear fuselage parts molded free of runners.

It’s very clear from the nature of the tooling that the kit was setup to be made into multiple versions.  As discussed above, there are four primary families of MiG-25, the P interceptor series, the R reconnaissance series, B anti-radar series and the U trainer series.  This release covers the later P series aircraft and we have see test shots of at least one R and one U, but the sprues betray other versions as being “in the works.”  We’ll get to that later.

Breaking down the kit parts:
Parts A1 & A2 are the main rear fuselage sections, molded separately from other trees

Sprue B: Upper Wings, intakes and drop tank

Sprue C: Lower Wings, intakes and drop tank

Sprue D: Vertical fins, afterburner parts

Sprue E: Alternate wing tips, horizontal tail planes, control surfaces, engine parts

Sprue F: Main forward fuselage halves, wheels, control surfaces, wheel well pieces

Sprue G: Pylons, and detail parts

Sprue H: Landing gear details, wheel well parts, additional small details

Sprue I (two included): R-40, R-60, R-73 missiles, FAB-1500 bombs, pylons

Sprue J (two included): Kh-58 missiles, FAB-500 bombs, pylons

Sprue PD: Nose section parts, specific to the PD interceptor version

Sprue GP: Clear parts

Photoetched Parts

Metal Parts: Nose Weight & Main Gear Inner Supports

The parts are very nicely molded, and while the runners and sprue attachment points are a bit heavy, the parts are largely free of notable sink marks, knock-out pin marks and flash.  There are a couple of exceptions, which are noted in the details below.  Surface details are finely molded, panel lines are crisp and even, and the rivet details are restrained.  I can remember looking in the box of Kitty Hawk’s initial release (the 1:48 F-94C) and thinking it looked a bit on the crude side compared to the current state of molding technology.  The MiG-25 has advanced well beyond that kit and even the more recent releases such as the Mirage F.1 and Saab JAS-39.


Interestingly, several of the parts that would normally be molded in halves by many other manufacturers – such as the vertical fins, tail planes, main weapons pylons, and similar parts are molded in one solid piece.  Despite the solid molding, the parts are smooth and free of defects.


I will note that in removing the parts from the sprues I discovered that on a number of the bigger parts, the attachment points make for difficult part removal.  This was particularly true on the leading edges of the intakes where long and heavy sprue attachments are present on the thin leading edge of the intake lip.  Care – and something like a razor saw – will be required when removing these parts.


About the Author

About Paul Cotcher (RedStar)
FROM: GEORGIA, UNITED STATES

I have been modeling since the mid-1970s, having learned pretty much all the different hobbies with my dad. My original fascination were kits of rockets and missiles, but soon after developed a fascination for jets, and have been modeling ever since. I primarily build 1:48 scale aircraft, and my c...


Comments

Great review Paul.
NOV 19, 2013 - 07:32 AM
Great review Paul! Looking forward to the build of this one. Doug
NOV 19, 2013 - 07:40 AM
I didn't see any mention in my quick read about the nose wheel FOD guard. The pictures I've seen online seem to show it as being a fair bit too large and not curved enough. Since it's pretty visible on the finished model, what's your take on the kit part? Can it be reworked, or is it another candidate for the aftermarket to address?
NOV 19, 2013 - 07:45 AM
It's not awful... If anything it's too thick. It's actually part of the gear doors for the forward nose gear. It doubles as a FOD catcher, but is not as "refined" as the screen/bar types that you see on newer Russian types. Here's a side picture of the real thing: LINK The curves that follow the wheel are fairing closely approximated, as are the other shapes. Probably as much a case of being the best they can do with an injection molded part as anything. I'm sure once we get some Eduard etch, or some resin gear doors as part of a Brassin set, we'll get a more refined part. Certainly wasn't anything that lept out at me like some other stuff I found. HTH
NOV 19, 2013 - 08:15 AM
I noticed it from the various pictures of test shots that I've seen where the bottom edge seems to be ready to drag on the ground. In this image it looks much taller and less curved than the one in your picture. I'm hoping that it's just sloppy assembly.
NOV 19, 2013 - 09:22 AM
Yep, that doesn't look right, and honestly, until you put the thing together, it'll be hard to tell. If it is over sized, it won't be hard to shave it a bit to scale it down. I can tell you, from comparison to the picture I linked, that it's much to thick, and will be a good candidate for photo-etch.
NOV 19, 2013 - 09:53 AM
Nice and thorough review Paul! 'Knowing onions' as we say! Alexei (NeOmega) Russiyan spotted the nose issue straight away as he started to test fit the NeOmega MiG-25 cockpit at Scale Modelworld, designed for the Revell kit BTW. It just took him 30 mins of fiddling and it fitted fine, although he is doing a Kittyhawk version as we speak. To try to correct the nose may be a trickier job though - it requires modifying the front fuz as well as the radome. Maybe it will be addressed in subsequent versions of the kit? Lets hope so! G
NOV 19, 2013 - 12:01 PM
To fix the nose would require the entire forward fuselage to be retooled, as the shape starts behind the "start" of parts PD1 and PD2. The radome itself is pretty much spot on, it's the nose section behind the radome that's the issue.
NOV 19, 2013 - 01:38 PM
Great work, nice review. Very useful review, especially for modelers that like to fix the shape problems of the plastic.
SEP 01, 2016 - 03:25 AM
BTW, I did the same comparison, the plastic with the drawing, and found pretty good matching. The intakes, the horizontal tail planes, the vertical stabilizers, the wings are pretty well match. The wing with bug, but sizes are pretty good. The discrepancies are up to a half millimeter.
SEP 01, 2016 - 03:56 AM