Early Aviation
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Discuss World War I and the early years of aviation thru 1934.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
Closed by request see page 4
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:26:58 (GMT).
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:27:25 (GMT).
Repainted
Joined: April 04, 2006
KitMaker: 1,058 posts
AeroScale: 1,004 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 05:46 AM UTC
Hm
How did you do that?i mean putting in that picture with all that text.Sorry T, I´ll just had to, hope you can forgive me
your build coming on nicley,
all the best
Larsa Q
How did you do that?i mean putting in that picture with all that text.Sorry T, I´ll just had to, hope you can forgive me
your build coming on nicley,
all the best
Larsa Q
Repainted
Joined: April 04, 2006
KitMaker: 1,058 posts
AeroScale: 1,004 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 05:51 AM UTC
Now that´s much better. Thanks. Looking real good just beware off that nasty sinkmark you got there.
If you have any Gunze Mr surfacer at your table, just set a drop over the sinkmark and before this is dry use some nail polish remover to smooth it off.
Cheers
Larsa
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:27:57 (GMT).
JackFlash
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 02:23 PM UTC
Dear Ms. Terri , Its Gremlins in the machine. Eyegore is better at beating them back. They are afraid of him.
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:28:42 (GMT).
Repainted
Joined: April 04, 2006
KitMaker: 1,058 posts
AeroScale: 1,004 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 03:40 AM UTC
Yes, I like it, I must learn this trick.By the way I like you´r framework too
Larsa
DAK66
Joined: April 28, 2006
KitMaker: 286 posts
AeroScale: 45 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 10:11 AM UTC
Looking good Terri ! Looks like you got the camera situation straightened out . 
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:29:18 (GMT).
MerlinV
Joined: November 26, 2006
KitMaker: 608 posts
AeroScale: 602 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 01:49 PM UTC
Nah, we are getting there (photo wise).
You will learn a lot from the mistakes that get made with this camera.
Great work on the frame Terri.
Cheers,
Hugh
You will learn a lot from the mistakes that get made with this camera.
Great work on the frame Terri.
Cheers,
Hugh
JackFlash
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 02:41 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Now I'm really scratching my head on this Lars ( I can here Stephen cursing me ) . I really try not to do that , but these computer thing gets to me at times to the point where tears comeI will be starting the left side tonight as well try and finish the Nieuport 17 I started a month ago !. . .
Cursing you? I say thee nay my dearest lady! Tis the sound of Eyegore beating back those Gremlins!
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:29:41 (GMT).
RAGIII
Joined: June 19, 2007
KitMaker: 604 posts
AeroScale: 600 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 02:22 AM UTC
Terri,
The engine and frame are looking great. It appears the the frame at the rear is a little taller on the side that isn't straight. A little trimming and reattachment of the top frame and everything should be fine!
RAGIII
The engine and frame are looking great. It appears the the frame at the rear is a little taller on the side that isn't straight. A little trimming and reattachment of the top frame and everything should be fine!
RAGIII
JackFlash
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 10:03 AM UTC
Me hug Eyegore? 
Uuuhh. . . thats not going to happen. It would confuse him.
Uuuhh. . . thats not going to happen. It would confuse him.DAK66
Joined: April 28, 2006
KitMaker: 286 posts
AeroScale: 45 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 12:14 PM UTC
Hi terri yes i was the one you got the Fokker from the pictures do look clearer and the engine looks real good too keep up the good work 
Mobious
Joined: May 18, 2008
KitMaker: 210 posts
AeroScale: 80 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 02:00 PM UTC
Hello,
Just a couple of dumb questions from an observer.
1. Shouldn't there be lozenge fabric behind the frame work?
2. Will the .030" styrene rod framework interfere with the misc. kit parts such as the floor, the dash?
Best Regards,
Just a couple of dumb questions from an observer.
1. Shouldn't there be lozenge fabric behind the frame work?
2. Will the .030" styrene rod framework interfere with the misc. kit parts such as the floor, the dash?
Best Regards,
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:30:03 (GMT).
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:30:22 (GMT).
JackFlash
Joined: January 25, 2004
KitMaker: 11,669 posts
AeroScale: 11,011 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 05:43 AM UTC
The lozenge fabric was attached to just the inside of the seat backs. In 1918 the seat cushion was a parachute pack.
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:30:46 (GMT).
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:31:06 (GMT).
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:31:30 (GMT).
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:31:53 (GMT).
Removed by original poster on 09/30/08 - 13:32:17 (GMT).
 |
WEB HOSTING BY
Copyright ©2021 AeroScale and Kitmaker Network, a subsidiary of Silver Star Enterprises
All Rights Reserved. Please read our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
All Rights Reserved. Please read our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.