_GOTOBOTTOM
World War II: Great Britain
Aircraft of Great Britain in WWII.
Hosted by Rowan Baylis
Airfix 1/24th Mosquito
Merlin
Staff MemberSenior Editor
AEROSCALE
#017
_VISITCOMMUNITY
United Kingdom
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 17,582 posts
AeroScale: 12,795 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 11:24 PM UTC
Hi Michael

That's an interesting idea. On the Mossie, you can find photos that back up both the masked and free-hand theories - and not always with a hard-masked division between the topsides and undersides. It's both the beauty and nightmare of our hobby.

All the best

Rowan
EdgarBrooks
_VISITCOMMUNITY
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: June 03, 2006
KitMaker: 397 posts
AeroScale: 384 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 01:22 AM UTC
It was actually the other way round, with freehand "blending" of colours at the start of the war, then, after Farnborough said there was nothing to be gained from the method, the use of mats was advocated.
Remember, this would have been at the factory, possibly at the Civil Repair Organisation, maybe certain M.U.s, but not at Squadron level.
Freehand spraying = rough overspray = drag = slowed-down aircraft, which they wanted to avoid at all cost. Keeping pilots alive was what mattered, not pretty patterns, and, mid-war, the trade of Aircraft Finisher was introduced, whose job was to keep the finish as pristine as possible. If paint needed retouching, he was supposed to sand it smooth, afterwards, then wash the airframe down with plain, clean water (possibly explains some of the "glossy" airframes in some photos.)
A few weeks ago, I received a message from a man, who told me how his (now sadly deceased) mother had worked in a London factory, producing Mosquito fuselages, and she told him that they'd used partially-tanned animal hides to produce their mats (she'd also worked in the leather industry, so knew the trade,) and had found the smell so sickening, she had to be taken off the final spraying.
He's since found a friend of his mother, who worked in the same factory, who has confirmed the awful smell, and he's promised to ask her for any further anecdotes/information.
MichaelSatin
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
AEROSCALE
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 19, 2008
KitMaker: 3,909 posts
AeroScale: 2,904 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 01:49 AM UTC
Really interesting stuff Edgar, as always. Thanks!!

Michael
Scrodes
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Ontario, Canada
Joined: July 22, 2012
KitMaker: 771 posts
AeroScale: 763 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 08:40 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi Michael

That's an interesting idea. On the Mossie, you can find photos that back up both the masked and free-hand theories - and not always with a hard-masked division between the topsides and undersides. It's both the beauty and nightmare of our hobby.

All the best

Rowan



It's a blessing for important airframes like this one from Operation Jericho of which no photos seem to exist. It means I can paint it as I please and no one can prove me wrong.

End of the day I love it, Glenn loves it and I'm willing to bet a few of you do as well.
the1pendragon
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Florida, United States
Joined: January 07, 2014
KitMaker: 25 posts
AeroScale: 25 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 05:15 PM UTC

Quoted Text

End of the day I love it, Glenn loves it and I'm willing to bet a few of you do as well.



Amen to that Matt! I think she looks awesome!
 _GOTOTOP