Really got to question your photo-analysis 'skills' Gaston, such as they are!
The upper surface dihedral break is subtle but if you look properly you'll see its just outboard of that fellows right foot. I can see it, why can't you? Its your picture!
Why you've attempted to highlight the leading edge of the opposite wing, which is clearly distorted due to both angle and perspective at the very least, is beyond me, its not the dihedral line of the wing, its not even close to the dihedral line of the wing.
I don't know the minutia of IL-2 lore but I can interpret a picture far more accurately than you seem able to do while demonstrating that you are wrong at the same time!
I'm in agreement with Ron (macplus) your knowledge of specific types is questionable, your image analysis skills, that you rely on so much to prove you are right, are questionable and as a result your conclusions about what is right and wrong with so many kits you lambast are equally questionable.
Don't get me wrong Gaston, I'd much rather know about potential faults with a new kit, helps me make my mind up whether to spend my hard earned cash or not. But I much prefer it if the information is shared once the kit is actually in your hands, not supposed and surmised and guessed at from a few randomly culled images from Google!
The few times you've actually scored a goal with one of your rants are far outweighed by the number of times you are wrong in your conclusions. Wrong because of inadequate knowledge, poor research and the afore-mentioned habit of dragging dubious pictures off the Internet and trying to pass them off as proof of your opinion!
Associate Editor
