Hi again
Picking up from the previous thread...
What's this pre-war trainer?:
All the best
Rowan
General Aircraft
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
Aircraft Trivia Quiz 2 (Join In)
Posted: Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 09:50 AM UTC
mrobeson
California, United States
Joined: September 19, 2007
KitMaker: 109 posts
AeroScale: 107 posts
Joined: September 19, 2007
KitMaker: 109 posts
AeroScale: 107 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 09:56 AM UTC
De Havilland Tiger Moth...
Posted: Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 10:03 AM UTC
Hi Matthew
No - not a de Havilland.
All the best
Rowan
No - not a de Havilland.
All the best
Rowan
eerie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 26, 2004
KitMaker: 1,008 posts
AeroScale: 106 posts
Joined: September 26, 2004
KitMaker: 1,008 posts
AeroScale: 106 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 - 02:12 PM UTC
Stampe SV.4
Posted: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 - 07:36 PM UTC
Hi there
No, not a Stampe.
Time for a clue: Look to South America...
All the best
Rowan
No, not a Stampe.
Time for a clue: Look to South America...
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Friday, January 23, 2009 - 08:53 AM UTC
Hi all
Still no closer? I think another clue will give it away...
Ohh well, try Brazil!
All the best
Rowan
Still no closer? I think another clue will give it away...
Ohh well, try Brazil!
All the best
Rowan
jaypee
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Posted: Friday, January 23, 2009 - 11:49 AM UTC
brazil? Muniz ? M-7 or M-9 not sure which. no hang on 4 cylinders gypsy M7
the m9 had a gypsy 6 so pretty much a de havilland
the m9 had a gypsy 6 so pretty much a de havilland
Posted: Friday, January 23, 2009 - 08:12 PM UTC
Well done JP - over to you for the next one.
All the best
Rowan
All the best
Rowan
jaypee
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2009 - 10:33 PM UTC
No irish connection this time. Simply what is this?
gaborka
Borsod-Abauj-Zemblen, Hungary
Joined: October 09, 2005
KitMaker: 626 posts
AeroScale: 264 posts
Joined: October 09, 2005
KitMaker: 626 posts
AeroScale: 264 posts
Posted: Monday, January 26, 2009 - 12:53 AM UTC
This is a clear example of a factory reject... obviously it is assembled the wrong way
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 - 10:48 AM UTC
Hi JP
Good grief! What a brute! That's the kind of monstrosity that I'd normally come up with! I'm lost without the Irish connection... I don't know where to start!
All the best
Rowan
Good grief! What a brute! That's the kind of monstrosity that I'd normally come up with! I'm lost without the Irish connection... I don't know where to start!
All the best
Rowan
jaypee
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 - 11:57 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi JP
Good grief! What a brute! That's the kind of monstrosity that I'd normally come up with! I'm lost without the Irish connection... I don't know where to start!
All the best
Rowan
From you rowan I'll take that as a compliment. Let see time for a clue. it was designed to be a night fighter
grubbyfingers
Victoria, Australia
Joined: September 07, 2007
KitMaker: 404 posts
AeroScale: 339 posts
Joined: September 07, 2007
KitMaker: 404 posts
AeroScale: 339 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 - 12:09 PM UTC
OMG! Supermarine did THAT? They gave us the S.6B, Spitfire, Stranraer, Southhampton and THAT!
Apparently it's a Supermarine Night Hawk.
Supermarine Nighthawk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nighthawk
Supermarine Nighthawk
Role Anti-Zeppelin Fighter
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Supermarine
First flight 1917
Status Prototype only
Number built 1
Developed from Pemberton Billing P.B.29E
The P.B.31E Night Hawk, the first project of the Pemberton-Billing operation after it became Supermarine Aviation Works Ltd., was a prototype anti-Zeppelin fighter with a crew of three to five and an intended endurance of 9 to 18 hours. It was first flown in February 1917 with Clifford Prodger at the controls.[1]
It had six-bay swept quadriplane wings, the fuselage filled the gap between the second and third wings, and a biplane tailplane with twin fins and rudders. The cockpit was enclosed and heated.
For armament, it had a trainable nose-mounted searchlight, a 1½-pounder (37mm) Davis gun mounted above the top wing with 20 shells, and two .303-inch Lewis guns. Power for the searchlight was provided by an independent petrol engine-driven generator set made by ABC- possibly the first instance of a recognisable airborne APU.[2]
It was advertised as being able to reach 75 mph, but the prototype only managed 60 mph at 6500 ft and took an hour to climb to 10,000 ft, totally inadequate for intercepting Zeppelins.[3] Given the Anzani's reputation for unreliability and overheating, it is unlikely that the airplane would have delivered the advertised endurance either.
Apparently it's a Supermarine Night Hawk.
Supermarine Nighthawk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nighthawk
Supermarine Nighthawk
Role Anti-Zeppelin Fighter
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Supermarine
First flight 1917
Status Prototype only
Number built 1
Developed from Pemberton Billing P.B.29E
The P.B.31E Night Hawk, the first project of the Pemberton-Billing operation after it became Supermarine Aviation Works Ltd., was a prototype anti-Zeppelin fighter with a crew of three to five and an intended endurance of 9 to 18 hours. It was first flown in February 1917 with Clifford Prodger at the controls.[1]
It had six-bay swept quadriplane wings, the fuselage filled the gap between the second and third wings, and a biplane tailplane with twin fins and rudders. The cockpit was enclosed and heated.
For armament, it had a trainable nose-mounted searchlight, a 1½-pounder (37mm) Davis gun mounted above the top wing with 20 shells, and two .303-inch Lewis guns. Power for the searchlight was provided by an independent petrol engine-driven generator set made by ABC- possibly the first instance of a recognisable airborne APU.[2]
It was advertised as being able to reach 75 mph, but the prototype only managed 60 mph at 6500 ft and took an hour to climb to 10,000 ft, totally inadequate for intercepting Zeppelins.[3] Given the Anzani's reputation for unreliability and overheating, it is unlikely that the airplane would have delivered the advertised endurance either.
jaypee
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 - 08:44 PM UTC
Yes, haha. It couldn't even catch a zeppelin. They would turn on the searchlight and the zeppelin would rise to above 10000ft. Rubbish.
Good call Graeme. Over to you
Good call Graeme. Over to you
grubbyfingers
Victoria, Australia
Joined: September 07, 2007
KitMaker: 404 posts
AeroScale: 339 posts
Joined: September 07, 2007
KitMaker: 404 posts
AeroScale: 339 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 - 11:31 AM UTC
Thanks, JP.
To something a bit more succesful, but still ultimately a failure ...
To something a bit more succesful, but still ultimately a failure ...
Posted: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 - 10:44 PM UTC
Is it the Air Traders Ltd Accountant? A truly fantastic, inspiring name if ever I saw one ...
grubbyfingers
Victoria, Australia
Joined: September 07, 2007
KitMaker: 404 posts
AeroScale: 339 posts
Joined: September 07, 2007
KitMaker: 404 posts
AeroScale: 339 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 - 11:14 PM UTC
That didn't last long! Well done, Sean, it is in fact the ATL-90 Accountant. What were they thinking?
I wonder what the most bizarre aircraft name is? I know some car names are a hoot. Ford here had a coupe in the 60s that was called the Tudor, the sedan version was, of course, called the Fodor.
Over to you.
Graeme.
I wonder what the most bizarre aircraft name is? I know some car names are a hoot. Ford here had a coupe in the 60s that was called the Tudor, the sedan version was, of course, called the Fodor.
Over to you.
Graeme.
Posted: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 - 11:38 PM UTC
Do not start me on car names. I've been making up definitions for the sillier ones for some time now; I'm up to 27 pages and nowhere near finished. (PM me if you want to see them!)
Okay, since the Accountant faintly reminds me of it ... which airliner's brochure reputedly claimed it featured "portable water"?
Okay, since the Accountant faintly reminds me of it ... which airliner's brochure reputedly claimed it featured "portable water"?
grubbyfingers
Victoria, Australia
Joined: September 07, 2007
KitMaker: 404 posts
AeroScale: 339 posts
Joined: September 07, 2007
KitMaker: 404 posts
AeroScale: 339 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2009 - 12:01 AM UTC
I'm guessing it was a toilet. Maybe the Connie?
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2009 - 04:20 AM UTC
Nope, sorry. Nothing to do with toilets (I hope!) but not massively far away, though.
LongKnife
Jönköping, Sweden
Joined: April 25, 2006
KitMaker: 831 posts
AeroScale: 688 posts
Joined: April 25, 2006
KitMaker: 831 posts
AeroScale: 688 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 - 01:52 AM UTC
Let's shoot from the hip.
It's not a Connie, but not far away. Hmmm. It must be early, and covering long range flights, for this to be a thing to boast about.
My guess is the Boeing Stratocruiser. But I wasn't around in the glory days, so I might be wrong.
Tony
It's not a Connie, but not far away. Hmmm. It must be early, and covering long range flights, for this to be a thing to boast about.
My guess is the Boeing Stratocruiser. But I wasn't around in the glory days, so I might be wrong.
Tony
Posted: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 - 09:25 AM UTC
Hi Sean
Portable water, or potable water? I still haven't a clue! - maybe something early like an H.P.42?
All the best
Rowan
Portable water, or potable water? I still haven't a clue! - maybe something early like an H.P.42?
All the best
Rowan
jaypee
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 - 08:30 PM UTC
Most airline water isn't potable even in the 21st century
http://www.mindfully.org/Water/Airline-Water-Safety1nov02.htm
Read this report. I'm bringing me own bottle from now on.
Oh no we can't because of "terrorists". I'll just get the boat instead
http://www.mindfully.org/Water/Airline-Water-Safety1nov02.htm
Read this report. I'm bringing me own bottle from now on.
Oh no we can't because of "terrorists". I'll just get the boat instead
Posted: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 - 10:41 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi Sean
Portable water, or potable water? I still haven't a clue! - maybe something early like an H.P.42?
All the best
Rowan
The portable/potable confusion is the key but it's not the dear old HP.42. It is British, though. (That should narrow it down - you can practically count the number of British airliners on the fingers of one elbow ...)
jaypee
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Joined: February 07, 2008
KitMaker: 1,699 posts
AeroScale: 1,384 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 - 10:58 PM UTC
Short s.17 Kent?