According to official Documents all 3 Aircraft were classified as Fighter-Bomber.
The FW-190 F class was redesigned to be Fighter-Bomber's primarily, That to say they could fight other planes and bomb other targets.
The Typhoon was also redesigned as a Fighter-Bomber as the RAF need a primary ground attack Aircraft in Northern Europe. It could also be used as a Fighter.
So either one could be called CAS Planes, But I think we are getting away from the what this campaign is about. It is about Planes that's primary job is to support the ground troops, Like the Stuka, SBD, A-10, Mohawk and the AC-130. It is also to take you out of what you normally build and to model something different.
I have built some Spitfires, Mustangs Tanks, Ships and a Bomber. So this is going to get my away from my comfort zone and try something different.
I think that we need to rethink some of the rules, I know the moans and groans are starting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a600b/a600b4233742120f911aeaff0085fc70a42067b8" alt=""
I think that maybe that the only Planes allowed are the ones that were built to do Close Support of the troops in a combat area and leave out the redesigned ones.
There must be enough models out their to support such a campaign.
I am not trying to get anyone angry or mad at me or criticize any of your proposed builds, But I think that all of us need to be shaken out of our comfort zone every so often. It ,I think, Will make us a better modeler when we try new types of models to build.
To all of you that did all that research, Good job.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06ab/d06ab722307f5efe356b0d378839d8800d636f8d" alt=""
All of this is IMHO and no way reflects Jim in any way.
Cheers,
Bruce
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06ab/d06ab722307f5efe356b0d378839d8800d636f8d" alt=""