Quoted Text
Quoted Text
The Me-109 was aways described, and always known, as an unusually small fighter: This kit, next to any other WWII fighter, will give almost no clue as to why that is. It now matches within about six inches the wingspan of its stablemate, the FW-190A, always known as a much bigger aircraft...
Gaston a quick check of the web shows that the 109 and 190 were dimensionally very close to each other.
Wing span of the 109 was 9.91 metres, while the 190 had a span of 10m.
Lengthwise the 109 was 8.95 metres long and the 190 was 8.97 metres long.
So your assumption that the 190 was a much larger aircraft is from my reckoning not true. In fact the 190 was known as being one of the smaller radial engine aircraft.
I don't know where you got the span of the FW-190A at 10 m, but it is 10.50 m, and is quoted as such everywhere, and this matches the excellent Hasegawa kit. The Eduard kit just about halves that 60 cm span difference, just as I said...
I seem to remember the true length on both was a hair over 9 meters.
The fuselage length of both is indeed very close, but the bulk of the aircraft is something else: The G-6 is typically 6500 to 7000 lbs, the FW-190A is 8900 to 9500 lbs, a huge 40% difference.
This did not prevent however, contrary to much current "expert knowledge", to have them interact in combat in ways completely opposite to current blithe assumptions about their weights: The Fw-190A was best used in the slowest speed level turn-fighting, while the less maneuverable Me-109G was used as a high speed dive and zoom vertical fighter, at the fastest speed, the two thus complementing one another beautifully. The exact opposite is now widely assumed, which just shows the fragility of real history, even on the most basic technical level... But I disgress...
I have read that the width of the Eduard canopy's base matches the Hasegawa kit, so that should mean 14 mm: Proportionately, that is an even bigger error than the wingspan...
I don't know why drawings should be mentionned when the basic overall span dimensions have never been a problem. The length has been a debate issue, but it is irrelevant to what I said, and the Eduard kit is said to be too long anyway, in the same way the E was, plus the 10 cm too long rudder(according to Mansur Mustafin).
Gaston
