I have a lot of these Eduard 110s in my stash. Based on your and Emres comments I know what to look out for.
Looking forward to see more
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06ab/d06ab722307f5efe356b0d378839d8800d636f8d" alt=""
PS. congratulations on giving up your freedom, Emre
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ead7/8ead726c4c365a366ab185b53248c0eb1f838dd4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a600b/a600b4233742120f911aeaff0085fc70a42067b8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a600b/a600b4233742120f911aeaff0085fc70a42067b8" alt=""
@ Emre,
In my opinion there is no easy path to resolve painlessly those. cowlings...
Actually my approach is the epoxy putty ( lots!) on the cowling side of the step, mainly because it makes more sense in ease of apply (of putty I mean), and has less panel lines & rivets to scribe.
Mind you Emre, the C/D/E version can be less vicious than the G version with that bump right next to the step
Spirits up, because the the kit is actually very good in all the rest, though I wonder how the Cybber-Hobby kit behaves in this area?!?!
Cheers
@Damian, I may have done too many tamiya kits to form that impression, but it is quiet a dilemma to sand the joints and lose the raised panel lines.
Quoted Text@Damian, I may have done too many tamiya kits to form that impression, but it is quiet a dilemma to sand the joints and lose the raised panel lines.
Yeah, I know the feeling for sure. Maybe my explanation wasn't very clear though. I found that when I test fitted the parts there were gaps caused by "raised" sections along the edge of the part, especially around the locating pins. Once I evened those areas out, sometimes by removing the locating pins, the gaps disappeared and I barely used any putty at all.
I hope this makes more sense.
Cheers, D
![]() |