Hi Fred
no, as I wrote it is an American product. Another famous plane from that manufacturer had the same nickname (Seeräuber--- hint, hint, hint) later the name was used again .....
As I gave so much hints: I'd like to have the designation it was sold by to Germany ... but If you can't give it it is ok either
cheers
Steffen
General Aircraft
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
This forum is for general aircraft modelling discussions.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
Aircraft Jeopardy Trivia nr. 6
Posted: Thursday, April 06, 2006 - 12:37 PM UTC
Posted: Thursday, April 06, 2006 - 03:26 PM UTC
Hi Steffen
Sorry - I haven't been paying attention to the Quiz!
I think it's a Chance-Vought V85.
All the best
Rowan
Sorry - I haven't been paying attention to the Quiz!
I think it's a Chance-Vought V85.
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Thursday, April 06, 2006 - 03:55 PM UTC
Hi Rowan
well after throwing so much "hints" someone had to come up with the right solution. Yes it is the Chance-Vought O2U "Corsair" or better, as it is in German markings the Chance-Vought V 85 G (for German) as in V 80 P (for Peru). The German nick name was Kurier as it was bought by Lufthansa for trans-european post flights (to Lisboa). Thus the pilot seat went to the rear cockpit and was enclosed and the front seat was replaced with a cargo bay. This was for the tests again replaced with an open observer cockpit.
The intention was to get an idea of Americant seaplanes and to test if a central float or the German-typical 2 floats are better. the outcome was not clear. For open sea the central float was considered better but for others as the Baltic or North Sea the 2 float variant was considered better.
Thanks Rowan for relieving me as I am away for the weekend. Now it is your turn I guess.
best wishes
Steffen
well after throwing so much "hints" someone had to come up with the right solution. Yes it is the Chance-Vought O2U "Corsair" or better, as it is in German markings the Chance-Vought V 85 G (for German) as in V 80 P (for Peru). The German nick name was Kurier as it was bought by Lufthansa for trans-european post flights (to Lisboa). Thus the pilot seat went to the rear cockpit and was enclosed and the front seat was replaced with a cargo bay. This was for the tests again replaced with an open observer cockpit.
The intention was to get an idea of Americant seaplanes and to test if a central float or the German-typical 2 floats are better. the outcome was not clear. For open sea the central float was considered better but for others as the Baltic or North Sea the 2 float variant was considered better.
Thanks Rowan for relieving me as I am away for the weekend. Now it is your turn I guess.
best wishes
Steffen
Posted: Thursday, April 06, 2006 - 04:08 PM UTC
Hi Steffen
Well, I must admit your clue about it being American certainly helped! I just got my copy of Heinz J. Nowarra's "Fremde Vögel unterm Balkenkreuz" down from the shelf and there she was! :-)
I've got the scanner warmed up, so I'll go hunting...
All the best
Rowan
Well, I must admit your clue about it being American certainly helped! I just got my copy of Heinz J. Nowarra's "Fremde Vögel unterm Balkenkreuz" down from the shelf and there she was! :-)
I've got the scanner warmed up, so I'll go hunting...
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Thursday, April 06, 2006 - 04:28 PM UTC
Hi again
Ok - this one could hardly be more different than the last subject; what's this?:
All the best
Rowan
Ok - this one could hardly be more different than the last subject; what's this?:
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2006 - 01:18 AM UTC
Quoted Text
It is a stripped airframe. :-)
I think someone misread the building instructions!
Jean-Luc
Grumpyoldman
_ADVISOR
Florida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
AeroScale: 836 posts
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
AeroScale: 836 posts
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2006 - 01:21 AM UTC
Now, I'm sure Rowan really knows what that aircraft is.
It's one that all modelers have been requesting for years.
It's one that all modelers have been requesting for years.
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2006 - 03:25 AM UTC
BAC Hawk?
Folan Gnat?
Folan Gnat?
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2006 - 03:33 AM UTC
:-) Hi all!
I should say it's not a wreck! And - by way of a clue... it's not even finished yet! A bit of lateral thinking is needed... where do you find really exciting new piston-engined aircraft taking shape?... (it's planned to have a Wright R-3350 up front...)
All the best
Rowan
I should say it's not a wreck! And - by way of a clue... it's not even finished yet! A bit of lateral thinking is needed... where do you find really exciting new piston-engined aircraft taking shape?... (it's planned to have a Wright R-3350 up front...)
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2006 - 04:32 AM UTC
Is it, Mr. Awesome was a highly modified Soviet Yak-11 WWII fighter, built for Joe Kasperoff by Matt Jackson and the talented group of air-race enthusiasts of Van Nuys California . The aircraft sported a 3,700 hp Wright R-3350 Turbo - Compound radial engine (equipped with Power Recovery Turbines), swinging a broad-bladed prop from a Douglas Skyraider.
Andy (++)
Andy (++)
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2006 - 04:38 AM UTC
Hi Andy
No... but you're definitely on the right lines!
You have to admit, it makes a change from my usual 1920s and 30s weirdos! :-)
All the best
Rowan
No... but you're definitely on the right lines!
You have to admit, it makes a change from my usual 1920s and 30s weirdos! :-)
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Monday, April 10, 2006 - 11:51 AM UTC
Hi again
If no-one posts the answer by the time I get home tonight, I'll put you out of your misery and set a fresh question.
All the best
Rowan
If no-one posts the answer by the time I get home tonight, I'll put you out of your misery and set a fresh question.
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Monday, April 10, 2006 - 11:58 PM UTC
Hi again
OK - as promised, the identity to the mystery aircraft:
It's Darryl Greenamyer's Reno Unlimited racer. He's been working on the project for several years and the design uses parts from several other aircraft, such as an F-86 tail and outer wing panels from a Sea Fury.
Right - time for a return my more usual type of subject. What's this aircraft?:
All the best
Rowan
OK - as promised, the identity to the mystery aircraft:
It's Darryl Greenamyer's Reno Unlimited racer. He's been working on the project for several years and the design uses parts from several other aircraft, such as an F-86 tail and outer wing panels from a Sea Fury.
Right - time for a return my more usual type of subject. What's this aircraft?:
All the best
Rowan
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 10:46 PM UTC
Hi again
No ideas about this pretty little fighter? I hope someone gets it tonight, because I'm heading away for a couple of days tomorrow.
All the best
Rowan
No ideas about this pretty little fighter? I hope someone gets it tonight, because I'm heading away for a couple of days tomorrow.
All the best
Rowan
Grumpyoldman
_ADVISOR
Florida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
AeroScale: 836 posts
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
AeroScale: 836 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 - 03:38 PM UTC
OH Woe is me...
I still can't find the answer......
I still can't find the answer......
Posted: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 - 03:54 PM UTC
Hi Dave
It's obviously time for a clue. Try thinking of a British firm that built a rather famous "wooden wonder".
All the best
Rowan
It's obviously time for a clue. Try thinking of a British firm that built a rather famous "wooden wonder".
All the best
Rowan
brandydoguk
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: October 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,495 posts
AeroScale: 643 posts
Joined: October 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,495 posts
AeroScale: 643 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 - 10:22 PM UTC
Hi Rowan,
Is it a De Havilland D.H.77? I'm guessing as I haven't found any pics to verify this, only a description.
Is it a De Havilland D.H.77? I'm guessing as I haven't found any pics to verify this, only a description.
CRS
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 - 10:52 PM UTC
Hi Martin,
Rowan has given me the "priviliage" of watching for a correct answer to his question, as he's a little tied up
You are correct, sir it is the DH 77
Over to you for a new question
Rowan has given me the "priviliage" of watching for a correct answer to his question, as he's a little tied up
You are correct, sir it is the DH 77
Over to you for a new question
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2006 - 12:34 AM UTC
Nice one Martin
Off the hook at last! - I was frightened I'd have to come up with a third question!
All the best
Rowan
Off the hook at last! - I was frightened I'd have to come up with a third question!
All the best
Rowan
brandydoguk
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: October 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,495 posts
AeroScale: 643 posts
Joined: October 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,495 posts
AeroScale: 643 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2006 - 01:01 AM UTC
When the Panavia Tornado was in design and development it had the name M.R.C.A. (Multi Role Combat Aircraft). However due to delays in the progress of the design and development of the aircraft the letters MRCA were given a derogatory meaning by some in the RAF.
What was the derogatory meaning given for the letters M.R.C.A.?
What was the derogatory meaning given for the letters M.R.C.A.?
NebLWeffah
Alberta, Canada
Joined: October 13, 2004
KitMaker: 1,683 posts
AeroScale: 58 posts
Joined: October 13, 2004
KitMaker: 1,683 posts
AeroScale: 58 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2006 - 01:24 AM UTC
"My Really Cranky Airplane"? hahaha :-) :-)
sorry, couldn't resist...
Bob
sorry, couldn't resist...
Bob
brandydoguk
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: October 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,495 posts
AeroScale: 643 posts
Joined: October 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,495 posts
AeroScale: 643 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2006 - 01:45 AM UTC
:-) Not correct but it gave me a laugh. :-)
Posted: Friday, April 21, 2006 - 01:33 AM UTC
Hi Martin
Is it Must Refurbish Canberra Again.
If It`s the right answer I am sorry but I will not be able to pose a question for the next two weeks.As I will not have access to a decent computer due to my work shift pattern.If you wish to pose one on my behalf.Thanks
Dennis
Is it Must Refurbish Canberra Again.
If It`s the right answer I am sorry but I will not be able to pose a question for the next two weeks.As I will not have access to a decent computer due to my work shift pattern.If you wish to pose one on my behalf.Thanks
Dennis