Aircraft Trivia Quiz (Join In)
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
AeroScale: 54 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 05:07 AM UTC
I am going to go with this...
General Aircraft GAL.45 Owlet
Merlin
Senior Editordata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76419/7641917542674db2a7cc6d911a3e68b095aa6a58" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#017
United Kingdom
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 17,582 posts
AeroScale: 12,795 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 11:31 PM UTC
Hi again Jim
Well done - you've nailed it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c001/4c00123a85458f2f5cb79ee0d5dd41edd85d7aa3" alt=""
Over to you for the next question...
All the best
Rowan
BEWARE OF THE FEW...
As I grow older, I regret to say that a detestable habit of thinking seems to be getting a hold of me. - H. Rider Haggard
Grumpyoldman
_ADVISORFlorida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
AeroScale: 836 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 20, 2007 - 11:54 PM UTC
Well, thank God, somebody got that.
It was driving me crazy.
Character is what you do when no one is looking.
Few things are harder to put up with than a good example.- Mark Twain
Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure that there is one less scoundrel in the world.--Thomas Carlyle
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
AeroScale: 54 posts
Posted: Friday, December 21, 2007 - 12:29 AM UTC
That was HARD. I couldn't find a good picture to back up what I had read. I finally found one and that confirmed it.
My question will be coming shortly.
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
AeroScale: 54 posts
Posted: Friday, December 21, 2007 - 01:15 AM UTC
OK, hey you go. Rack your brains and see waht you come up with.
Idaho, United States
Joined: May 16, 2003
KitMaker: 895 posts
AeroScale: 457 posts
Posted: Monday, December 24, 2007 - 04:48 AM UTC
Hello Goldenpony,
The aircraft is actually a mock up of the Bell XF-109 Supersonic Vertical take off fighter. Like so many designs of the time it never made prototype status.
Sincerely,
Brian
There is only two kinds of fires. Those that use less than 500 gallons of water too extinguish and those that use WAY MORE!
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
AeroScale: 54 posts
Posted: Monday, December 24, 2007 - 12:47 PM UTC
Brian,
Your right on.
Idaho, United States
Joined: May 16, 2003
KitMaker: 895 posts
AeroScale: 457 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 - 11:11 AM UTC
Hello everyone,
Here is one thats different. It featured an enclosed cockpit. It was also the last pursuit aircraft to have fixed landing gear and externally braced wings. Originally it had a radial but was replaced with an inline engine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ab45/1ab4510e2a4ec770e624e4a3fadf80b45d0d949d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84d8a/84d8a92dc706d2407cf9a406d4866478b972d493" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f253/2f25333ff3468a93fa1933ef6dacccf4ef445d1c" alt=""
Sincerely,
Brian
There is only two kinds of fires. Those that use less than 500 gallons of water too extinguish and those that use WAY MORE!
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
AeroScale: 54 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 27, 2007 - 02:39 AM UTC
Brian
CURTISS XP-31 SWIFT
XP-31 1 First with radial, then "vee" engine
SPECIFICATIONS (with V-1570 engine):
Span: 36 ft. 0 in.
Length: 26 ft. 3 in.
Height: 7 ft. 9 in.
Powerplant: Curtiss V-1570-53 "Conqueror" of 600 hp
Armament: Two .30-cal. machine guns and (later) two .30-cal. machine guns in blisters mounted beside the cockpit
Maximum speed: 208 mph
Service ceiling: 24,400 ft.
Range: 370 mi.
Weight: 3,334 lbs. empty/4,143 lbs. (maximum)
Colorado, United States
Joined: July 25, 2007
KitMaker: 886 posts
AeroScale: 332 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 27, 2007 - 05:03 AM UTC
Well that was quick.
Idaho, United States
Joined: May 16, 2003
KitMaker: 895 posts
AeroScale: 457 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 27, 2007 - 05:41 AM UTC
Hello Jim,
Your correct. Funny how it has more in common (looks wise) with a P-26 than anything else. I do think the inline makes it more fighter like. It's to bad the re-engine did not improve its performance. Any way on to your question.
Brian
There is only two kinds of fires. Those that use less than 500 gallons of water too extinguish and those that use WAY MORE!
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
AeroScale: 54 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 27, 2007 - 06:35 AM UTC
At first I thought Boeing, then I remembered Curtiss made a bunch of early fighters. After that I pulled out my Janes book, and bingo.
OK, here is my question, what is this? Hint: Be careful!
Victoria, Australia
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 111 posts
AeroScale: 103 posts
Posted: Friday, December 28, 2007 - 12:48 AM UTC
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
AeroScale: 54 posts
Posted: Friday, December 28, 2007 - 04:47 AM UTC
Fred,
Yes, it is the Lockheed XFV-1 Salmon, very similar looking to the Pogo.
Your up!
California, United States
Joined: July 08, 2003
KitMaker: 1,936 posts
AeroScale: 1,168 posts
Posted: Friday, December 28, 2007 - 07:49 AM UTC
Victoria, Australia
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 111 posts
AeroScale: 103 posts
Posted: Friday, December 28, 2007 - 01:48 PM UTC
You could add the Ryan X-13 Vertijet to the list
I will have to pass I don't know how to add photo's to the forum
Fred
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
AeroScale: 54 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 29, 2007 - 01:12 AM UTC
You don't need photos to ask a question.
Victoria, Australia
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 111 posts
AeroScale: 103 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 29, 2007 - 02:11 AM UTC
Ok
What single engin fighter aircraft flew with pistion then jet engin
Fred
Sorry about the spelling
Virginia, United States
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 1,174 posts
AeroScale: 226 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 10:14 AM UTC
Fred,
This was completed by several types. The P-40,P47,P-51, and the AH1 Skyraider all started as piston engine and had a future jet engine installed thruout its career.
"HAAA YOU THINK THIS CAR IS BAD,,MY OTHER ONE ONLY HAS TWO WHEELS'
In War...., Everybody Loses something!!
WHEN DOES A HOBBY Become A SICKNESS
Victoria, Australia
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 111 posts
AeroScale: 103 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 11:07 AM UTC
As far as I know only it made it into service
Hint "pusher"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76419/7641917542674db2a7cc6d911a3e68b095aa6a58" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#029
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: December 23, 2005
KitMaker: 6,249 posts
AeroScale: 3,270 posts
Posted: Monday, December 31, 2007 - 01:05 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Fred,
This was completed by several types. The P-40,P47,P-51, and the AH1 Skyraider all started as piston engine and had a future jet engine installed thruout its career.
Design work was undertaken to look into the feasablity of mounting a jet engine in a P-47 but to the best of my knowledge it never got off the drawing board.
Nige
It's not the same, better, but not the same...
Removed by original poster on 12/31/07 - 20:45:07 (GMT).
Victoria, Australia
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 111 posts
AeroScale: 103 posts
Posted: Monday, December 31, 2007 - 01:47 AM UTC
Hint 2 they make cars also (expensive cars)
Fred
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 7 posts
AeroScale: 6 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 - 06:58 PM UTC
Saab did it with that twin-boom thingy, the J.21...
Prop-driven:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c110c/c110cf07cbfd35794666c3ae7ab43eca73308bab" alt=""
Jet powered:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f844a/f844addff3a86e90fb5b70607baa6b1515f3e47d" alt=""
Mikoyan Gureyvich also did it with the Mig-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ead7/8ead726c4c365a366ab185b53248c0eb1f838dd4" alt=""
Must....Have....More....Plastic....For....Stash!
Victoria, Australia
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 111 posts
AeroScale: 103 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 - 06:51 PM UTC
Your right.
But I do not think the MiG-3 (Jet) when in to sqn service.
Fred